Quote:
Originally Posted by smoo
I don’t think you understand what is required of transport companies & their workshops or service providers when it comes to repairs and maintenance, and the CoR.
EVERYTHING has to be signed off (not necessarily repaired) for that vehicle to be deemed ‘safe’.
You’ve covered your **** by noting down the ABS defect.
The onus is then on your management to liaise with workshop management or maintenance contractor to get it sorted.
It is up to workshop to repair or sign off that it is ok to run.
If they can’t repair and aren’t happy sending it then your management need to accept that, and in my experience I’ve never had fleet control or dispatch or sub contractor demand a truck when I’ve told them it’s not safe to be on the road.
You’ve done your part, the CoR will have **** flowing uphill if you ended up in an accident and the original defect has not been repaired or has been signed off as safe when it isn’t.
All transport companies will keep a few years of maintenance recordS including drivers prestart/run/defect sheets explaining any defects and what acton was taken to remedy them. All of this paper work will have been signed off on completion by a mechanic and his or hers supervisor or manager. Transport companies are anal on this incase the worst should happen.
You are well within your rights to refuse to operate a vehicle you deem unsafe.
Management need to respect that. If they don’t then I’d be looking for another job. It’s not like there is a shortage of driving jobs around . |
No, you've read it wrong, there is no written evidence of the
ABS light because it was removed prior to the introduction of the legislation covering passenger transport vehicles, when I first started, discovered the problem and spoke to management and the mechanic about it, all we had to do was turn up, start the vehicle and drive off, there was no official reporting procedure.
Soon after the globe was removed and it passed inspection the new laws came in and we then had to tick off things like oil, p/s fluid, coolant, brake fluid, wipers and washers, brake lights, head and taillights, indicators, clearance lights, reverse lights, windscreen condition and tyre condition and pressures.
Up until the vehicle was taken off the road recently the 'warning light' box was ticked as compliant because there was no globe to give a warning.
Now you could argue that the inspection which it failed would point to there being a problem from that far back, but seeing as its passed twice since, no one at the inspection station is going to admit they failed to pick up the missing globe so they'll all say it was ok on both those occasions and has gone missing since, im not silly, I know how it works.
Interestingly the last two on the list, windscreen and tyres have been removed from the check list...after people started reporting issues, so now those cracks and questionable tyres no longer have a place to be reported...
Would those forms then stand up to scruitiny if something we're to happen, no way as tyre condition is mandatory, but im guessing they're not worried about the 'what if's' and focussing on the 'get out there and drive without costing us money'.
Jobs..lol, you don't live in SA do you...
Anyhow, that's enough for me on the topic, I didn't come in here to blow any whistles, I just came in to suggest that its the pressures to either put your **** on the line in suspect vehicles or deal with the fallout of highlighting the issues which is turning people away from the industry.