Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

View Poll Results: Should these things be allowed in built up areas, such as cities & suburbs?
Yes. 57 32.95%
No. 68 39.31%
If prime movers, tractors, etc. are allowed, so can these. 25 14.45%
Suburbs only. 3 1.73%
Who cares. 20 11.56%
Voters: 173. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21-12-2005, 08:27 PM   #61
Falcon Coupe
Clevo Mafia Inc.
 
Falcon Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,496
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: The exceptional contribution made to AFF over an extended period of time. Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Your tireless efforts behind the scenes in keeping AFF the place it is. 
Default

This thread is discriminatory and reeks of envy.
Falcon Coupe is online now  
Old 21-12-2005, 09:01 PM   #62
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default

If you cant drive a 4X4 safely anywhere, then you shouldnt be allowed to drive anything!
chevypower is offline  
Old 21-12-2005, 09:57 PM   #63
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default

as a long distance driver in my book there are more dangerouse penis heads out there in cars than scrubbers, however it would be nice if people towing trailers, cars and 4wd vehicles had some actual training in this area , and one thing in particular should be more emphasis on is overtaking skills(if in doubt dont), my only gripe with 4wd vehicles is the shape and protrusion of some bullbars, some are fine others are sort of wedge shaped and stick out way too far and are not safe
mik is offline  
Old 21-12-2005, 10:23 PM   #64
awsome4.0
Banned
 
awsome4.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: IN A 5.0
Posts: 281
Default

Stop worrying about 4X4s cause the bird flu will get us all
awsome4.0 is offline  
Old 21-12-2005, 10:37 PM   #65
johnydep
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
johnydep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 4,611
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech article(s) 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falcon Coupe
This thread is discriminatory and reeks of envy.

Nah, I'm not envious of a Landcruiser and I can't see any discrimination here.

Guy's, don't take peoples opinions so seriously.

We're in the pub aren't we?

When I go to the Pub with my mates we talk about stuff we see and have some fun disagreeing on some topics & agreeing with others, when we're finished we don't leave calling each other names.

If you don't agree with someone give your side of the story, don't try and shut everything down just because it's not to your liking.

If there is any discrimination it's coming from the people that give nothing to the thread except name calling.
__________________
The true danger only occurs when you take a potentially dangerous piece of machinery
and place it in the hands of the most unpredictable species on the planet.
Human behaviour, as history has catalogued, cannot account for what any persons actions may be,
especially concerning their love of the motor vehicle.

http://www.fireservicecollege.ac.uk
johnydep is offline  
Old 21-12-2005, 11:06 PM   #66
stockel
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
stockel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunny Melbourne
Posts: 546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnydep
Nah, I'm not envious of a Landcruiser and I can't see any discrimination here.

Guy's, don't take peoples opinions so seriously.

We're in the pub aren't we?

When I go to the Pub with my mates we talk about stuff we see and have some fun disagreeing on some topics & agreeing with others, when we're finished we don't leave calling each other names.

If you don't agree with someone give your side of the story, don't try and shut everything down just because it's not to your liking.

If there is any discrimination it's coming from the people that give nothing to the thread except name calling.
Couldn't have said it better!
I guess one possible contributing factor to the atmosphere is that this pub is low on women and grog!!! :hihi:
stockel is offline  
Old 21-12-2005, 11:07 PM   #67
Falcon Coupe
Clevo Mafia Inc.
 
Falcon Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,496
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: The exceptional contribution made to AFF over an extended period of time. Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Your tireless efforts behind the scenes in keeping AFF the place it is. 
Default

Jonydep i gave my opinion just as everyone else did, i chose not to single anyone out any of the rediculous comments as they have right of reply, as do i whether you agree with it or not.
Falcon Coupe is online now  
Old 22-12-2005, 01:15 AM   #68
K_Man
Whoa, this is heavy!
 
K_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Eastern Melbourne
Posts: 466
Default

I'm also of the opinion that 4x4 drivers should have their own licence. Perhaps something like a 'Light Recreational' licence. Make it cost something like an extra $50 or $100, and have extra testing on it, and a more critical practical exam (current Victorian practical exams are pretty pathetic in any case). $50 - $100 is a small premium to pay to drive a 4x4, and if truck drivers need a special licence, then 4x4 owners should too. For proper 4x4 enthusiasts, extra testing wouldn't be a problem, but it would weed out some of the absolute dropkicks that do drive them around the suburbs.

In any case, i'm just thinking out loud, but something like that would surely be somewhat feasable?
__________________
Liquid Silver 2002 AU III Fairmont wagon
Le Mans Red 1990 SA Capri Turbo
K_Man is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 02:38 AM   #69
eb91xr6
V8 Ute V8 Boat
 
eb91xr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: south australia
Posts: 1,804
Default

its the soccer mothers in the stock 4wd, the modded oned are driven by people who know how to drive them, or there just tools. but i think they should have to get a special licence to drive them, stops mothers gettting them and maby they can get a SW insted
__________________
VE SS Ute manual 09
AU XR8 UTE 200KW manual 02
Challanger Ski boat V8 01
125 Thumpster 2010
Swag
All set for the weekend
eb91xr6 is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 03:03 AM   #70
EL-XRAN
Xranmobile
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, W.A.
Posts: 26
Default

Nothing wrong with having a jacked up 4x4. Their passion is getting out in the bush, getting dirty and doing some exteme 4-wheel driving. Other peoples passion is having a nice low car that looks sweet, goes hard and has a killer sound stage in it. They have just as much right to have a jacked up car as what anyone else on this forum has to lower theirs. Admittedly, yeah...getting slammed by one of those would be deadly...but if you got slammed by anything doing 80clicks it would still be deadly. It's like trying to outlaw the 5-posters in the city. They have every right to want to protect their car from stock and wildlife straying onto roads. Everyone has their reason for having them. However if it's just being driven in the city and doesnt see any off-road action then the guy driving it is more than likely compensating for something anyway...
__________________
--In nuclear war, all mean are cremated equal--

>Monty the Customised Fairmont<
>Elektra the Lightning-strike Pursuit 250 Ute<
EL-XRAN is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 07:55 AM   #71
pb02
inconceivable!
 
pb02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XLS99 Ute man
You need a hobby. Like seriously there a so many things that a potentially dangerous, lets all just stay indoors and not leave the house at all
Why is it that everyone is trying to idiot proof the world???
I'm with you mate, we should just all wrap ourselves in bubble wrap and eliminate every sharp object in the world. :
pb02 is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 08:00 AM   #72
merlin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
merlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,974
Default

I don't think they should be banned...as much as I hate them, its still a free country last time i checked.

But I do think you should need a special license for a large 4WD and they should also be taxed higher due to their weight and space they take up on the road - trucks do, these things arn't far off.

But in the end its all personal choice, if you want to drive a vehicle that large in the city, which is hard to park, uses a e load of fuel, has the driving dynamics of a boat and 90% of the population think you have a small d$%k then go for it, no ones going to stop you... :
__________________
1966 Ford Mustang coupe. 347 stroker, PA reverse manual C4, TCE high stall converter, B&M Pro Ratchet, Edelbrock alum heads, Edelbrock intake manifold, MSD ignition, Holley Street HP 750 CFM carb, gilmer drive, wrapped Hooker Super Comp Headers, dual 3" straight through exhaust, Bilstein shocks, custom springs, full poly suspension, American Racing rims, Open Tracker roller spring saddles and shelby drop.

Still to go - Holley Sniper EFI with integrated fuel cell.
merlin is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 08:36 AM   #73
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Citric XR6
Big 4WDs like that are just ugly pigs that should be taxed out of existence.
Amen.

Had a mate who was T boned by one of these troglodite morons who went through a red light.
There was a reason I said HAD a mate, as he is no longer with us thanks to some foll with an inferiority complex and a 2 inch pecker - requiring such an oversized vehicle.

Problems are not just with the size of the vehicle, but the insular effect it offers the drivers which unfortunately turn to arrogance and plain stupidity. As the roads get busier this is the last thing we need, and the fact that in a side impact these vehicles are basically crushing one of the weakest points on a cars' chassis means that they do tremendous damage to the safety cell, alarmingly seriously injuring or killing occupants of any vehicle not of similar dimensions.
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE
ltd is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 08:42 AM   #74
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

Oh, and the territory is designed to sit so low. Whilst the motoring journos bagged it for lack of ground clearance I applauded it for its car like characteristics in a collision. Well done Ford, for thinking beyond the owners of these vehicles.
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE
ltd is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 08:45 AM   #75
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pb02
Why is it that everyone is trying to idiot proof the world???
I'm with you mate, we should just all wrap ourselves in bubble wrap and eliminate every sharp object in the world. :
Interesting how Boeing got sued successfully for some twat putting tape over the static vents and not removing it, causing aero peru to crash and kill 71 people. The liability issue was that Boeing allegedly should have foreseen such an oversight and were contributory to the mistake.

Imagine if those principals were applied to vehicle design. I think most car makers would be bankrupt by now, especially Toyota.
All it will take is some litigous nut after a big payout to make it possible.
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE
ltd is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 08:53 AM   #76
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abacus
I agree with the sentiments expressed regarding raised 4WDs, to the effect that: they are pigs in the city, potentially unsafe in the wrong hands, and not used for appropriate purpose by the majority of owners, who probably wouldn't slip them into 4WD during their complete period of ownership of the truck.

BUT you need to be careful when you call for any vehicles to be banned, on the basis that nobody really “needs” such a vehicle. If the government ever introduced laws limiting such vehicles, this could be the thin end of a very nasty wedge. Environmentalists could claim who “needs” those nasty fuel guzzling V8s – Ban Them!!. The Harold Scrubys of this world would scream who “needs” turbocharged engines , or anything with more performance than a Holden Barina – Ban Them!!.

I find any large 4WD a pain the backside in the city. They take up too much room on the road, you can’t see through them, and there is no doubt that many, if not most, of their drivers would probably have a real problem in a crisis situation. At the end of the day, however, you have to consider whether going down the road of government intervention might end up at a very unpleasant destination.
I think the point being raised is that currently these vehicles do not have the same taxes placed on them, and as such have become an incentive for people to buy them over any other normal car.

Additionally, they are classified as a commercial vehicle and as such do not attract any Fringe Benefits Tax, and again only serves to entice people to buy them over a normal car.
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE
ltd is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 09:00 AM   #77
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

Not sue myself about the "special licence" requirement for 4 x 4 owners.

If this was to be the case, why would'nt it also be reasonable to have all hi po vehicles (definition of which would be quite hard to define) only to be driven by people with a special 'hi po' endorsed licence.

I'm not aginst this as a concept, but realistically, how would this be inforced adequately and do we think this would solve the threat of death by either type of vehicle... probably not. But I guess it may weed out a few potential owners that can't be bothered endorsing their ticket.

On the other hand, why not bring ALL driver training up to a standard that adequately equipped all drivers to safely steer any light vehicle.. 4 x4, hi po or the family sedan ?
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 09:01 AM   #78
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mustang
wat if the house collapses : or if the house catches on fire and ur too affraid to go outside cause of a big bad 4x4 :

like the sayin goes for most demo derby drivers...."you could get hurt getting out of bed in the morning" :nutsycuck
Ridiculous.

What say then to all those that think they're ok but need to be in the right hands that we try a little experiment.

Let's put a loaded gun in your home and have a stranger come over and mind it for you. Afterall, in the right hands it wouldn't be as deadly now would it?

You can't implicitly trust the abilities of people you don't know, and re my earlier post about tax breaks for such vehicles, many an unskilled person are buying these types of cars to avoid paying more than necessary to the government through taxation.
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE
ltd is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 09:21 AM   #79
pb02
inconceivable!
 
pb02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ltd
You can't implicitly trust the abilities of people you don't know, and re my earlier post about tax breaks for such vehicles, many an unskilled person are buying these types of cars to avoid paying more than necessary to the government through taxation.

I don't think it has anything to do with buying these vehicles to avoid paying more tax!

Are you also implying that unskilled people only buy 4x4's???? How about the unskilled people behind the wheel of high performance cars, buses, trucks, hell almost every taxi!!!
pb02 is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 09:30 AM   #80
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

For something interesting to look at (as pointed out by "Raptor")
www.murcotts.com.au

All sorts of driving courses ... large vehicles ... off-road ... and towing/load carrying as well.

I think it's worth everyone's while to enquire/attend.

Maybe an AFF day in every state for all interested parties.
Mechan1k is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 09:40 AM   #81
pb02
inconceivable!
 
pb02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechan1k

I think it's worth everyone's while to enquire/attend.
I agree totally. The licensing system is far too easy. I think that advanced driving courses should be a mandatory part of obtaining a license.
I'm not saying I'm a good driver but I've done a fair share of driving and riding courses including several track days on cars and bikes and it has made a huge difference to how I drive on the roads. The problem as I see it is lack of education and understanding. Licensing and testing needs to be revised for all forms of road transport!
pb02 is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 09:47 AM   #82
SB076
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
SB076's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Filling up
Posts: 1,459
Default

I don't have a problem with 4x4's like that (provided they meet all applicable safety standards as does every other vehicle) Different people have different tastes/requirements and if people like or need 4x4's they should be able to drive them, just as any other vehicle. If we ban 4x4's what next? Should we ban Falcons and Commodores due to there size and power? Of course not. All vehicles can be considered unsafe because all vehicles have the ability to travel at 50Km/h and that is enough to kill someone. It all comes down to the people involved. I am all for reducing the road toll, however I don't think we should be blaming one particular type of vehicle
__________________
VIXEN MK II GT 0238

with Sunroof and tinted windows
with out all the go fast bits I actually need :
SB076 is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 09:53 AM   #83
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default

gee, what extra testing is there on a four wheel drive? How to select reverse is different on a 4x4 to a 4x2? They drive exactly the same, or are we going to pay $100 extra so we can be reminded that our vehicles are generally heavier? What a bargain!! Great idea! The road rules are the same for everybody in any car, they are not any more difficult to drive- so the licenses should be... THE SAME! Are we going to have trailer towing licenses too?
chevypower is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 10:10 AM   #84
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

Maybe not licencing for towing ... but some sort of training for drivers is NEEDED ... because no one gets taught going through Ls and Ps.

I saw a case the other day at the Waste Management facility ... a guy with an X-trail and a tiny box trailer ... do you think he could reverse it on a 45 degree angle the 6 metres he need .... noooooooo ... it took him 20 minutes to do it. I nearly told the guy to get out of his vehicle and I'd reverse it for him.

I nearly reversed the damn thing into my Territory ... it was so frustrating to watch.

OK ... this is kinda going off-topic ... but all-in-all ... I think everyone should undergo extra training in all aspects of driving ... EVEN towing as well.
Mechan1k is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 10:12 AM   #85
jspec_sti
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevypower
gee, what extra testing is there on a four wheel drive? How to select reverse is different on a 4x4 to a 4x2? They drive exactly the same, or are we going to pay $100 extra so we can be reminded that our vehicles are generally heavier? What a bargain!! Great idea! The road rules are the same for everybody in any car, they are not any more difficult to drive- so the licenses should be... THE SAME! Are we going to have trailer towing licenses too?
Agree, driving an Explorer is not much different to driving the Falcon - you are just sitting higher up. This thread is just as ridiculous as branding all drivers from a certain manufacturer as "hoons".
jspec_sti is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 10:19 AM   #86
pb02
inconceivable!
 
pb02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevypower
gee, what extra testing is there on a four wheel drive? How to select reverse is different on a 4x4 to a 4x2? They drive exactly the same, or are we going to pay $100 extra so we can be reminded that our vehicles are generally heavier? What a bargain!! Great idea! The road rules are the same for everybody in any car, they are not any more difficult to drive- so the licenses should be... THE SAME! Are we going to have trailer towing licenses too?
I'm not suggesting extra testing for 4x4 owners, it's for EVERYONE in general. I don't believe the problem is with 4x4's but with peoples driving skills in general.
pb02 is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 10:20 AM   #87
gozza
......
 
gozza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Northside Brisbane
Posts: 2,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bladexr8
The first point mate, no other cars exist on the road when she's in her Explorer!
lol well i will keep an eye out
thats the thing tho its not the REAL 4wd drives the bug me.....its the pretencious land rovers and land cruisers that have no purpose being driven on the highway
gozza is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 10:36 AM   #88
LTDHO
The one and only
 
LTDHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Carrum Downs, Victoria
Posts: 9,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevypower
gee, what extra testing is there on a four wheel drive? How to select reverse is different on a 4x4 to a 4x2? They drive exactly the same, or are we going to pay $100 extra so we can be reminded that our vehicles are generally heavier? What a bargain!! Great idea! The road rules are the same for everybody in any car, they are not any more difficult to drive- so the licenses should be... THE SAME! Are we going to have trailer towing licenses too?
I hope you're not serious. 4x4's drive alot differently than the standard sedan. There is a skill, this skill is laking from most 4x4 drivers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gozza
thats the thing tho its not the REAL 4wd drives the bug me.....its the pretencious land rovers and land cruisers that have no purpose being driven on the highway
The 4x4 you buy when you don't go 4x4ing! It's funny/stupid when you see the big alluminuim bullbar and LPG tank under the back. You know the only 'off road' it does is onto the nature strip!!
__________________
1992 DC LTDHO 360rwkw built by me
Tuned by CVE Performance
Going of the rails on a crazy train
Other cars include Dynamic ED Sprint, Dynamic DL LTD, Sparkling Burgundy DL LTD, Yellow, Red & Blue XB sedan & Black XB Coupe
LTDHO is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 10:38 AM   #89
jspec_sti
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gozza
lol well i will keep an eye out
thats the thing tho its not the REAL 4wd drives the bug me.....its the pretencious land rovers and land cruisers that have no purpose being driven on the highway
That I agree with! :

On another note, I notice that the person who started this thread has yet to offer any tangible evidence to answer their own question, and when challenged on this fact hides behind the "I wanted to start a discussion..." excuse. Before starting threads that are designed to turn into a witch hunt of a certain segment of society (deny this as much as you like but some of your earlier "Holden" based threads just confirm this fact), it may be prudent to conduct some research and back up your rhetoric with some actual facts, rather than just re-hashing Harold Scruby-like statements.

Yes, I won a 4WD. Why? Because I want to. Yes, I drive it around suburbia and the country as I see fit.

And, no, I don't need to be told what type of car I can own and where I can drive it.
jspec_sti is offline  
Old 22-12-2005, 10:59 AM   #90
smoo
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
smoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gozza
lol well i will keep an eye out
thats the thing tho its not the REAL 4wd drives the bug me.....its the pretencious land rovers and land cruisers that have no purpose being driven on the highway
But what other type of vehicle can offer the same amount of practicality though?
In your ideal world there would be a car for towing, off road, the kids/dog, sunday drive etc, but ya see, most people don't have pockets that deep. You might say MPVs, but a Chrysler Voyager will take up just as much space, gas, and is no easier to see around, yet can't tow as good as a 4wd or go off road. Probably has less interior space too, the new Discos and Volvos have pretty clever interiors that I have seen.
You say 'X' 4wd has no place being on the highway/suburbs. Fact is nearly every 4wd on the market these days will struggle with anything more than a sandy beach. Most are doing what they are mainly designed to do, drive on ROADS.

My BMW 5 series weighs 1.6t dry. With a tank of gas, and 4 people in, will be over 2 tonne (a trip to the tip with a trailer on the back was showing nearly 2.5t). Should I need a special licence to drive that too?
smoo is online now  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL