Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29-11-2012, 11:06 PM   #1
Luke Plaizier
Lukeyson
Donating Member1
 
Luke Plaizier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW
Posts: 2,580
Default New Sabre Jet/Rocket Engine vs Liquid LPG Injectors

A bit left field here.

Word has it that a jet/rocket engine long in development in the UK has recently demonstrated operation of a special new heat exchanger, and I was curious whether the same technology was in use on LiLPG injectors.

A quick background.

The Sabre engine in the UK is meant to be air-breathing at low altitudes, but use Liquid Oxygen at very high altitudes to operate as a ROcket and reach orbit. If it works it will have massive implications for reducing the cost of access to Space. The problem to be solved, however, was that as the engine reached high Mach numbers, the temperature of the air as it is compressed into the combustion chamber is some 1000C, rendering the engine very inefficient at these speeds. The longer it can breath air, the less LoX it needs to reach orbit. They had the low speed and orbital speed stuff sorted, just this mid-speed high-mach-number issue was hurting them.

The trick to solving high-mach-air-breathing is in the development of a new type of heat exchanger, which is using a revolutionary new technology to cool the air from 1000C to -15C in 1/100th of a second, without freezing up.

And then the thought struck me. Liquid LPG injectors go through the same rapid temperature change as the liqud evaporates. Previous metallic injector technologies all froze up after operating. The current injectors seem to add some sort of non-metallic injector-sheath on the tip to prevent freezing.

Could there be some non-metallic heat exchanger technology in use on this Sabre engine like there is on LiLPG injectors?

http://www.theengineer.co.uk/news/sa...014783.article



Lukeyson

__________________
If the human brain was simple enough to understand, we'd be too simple to understand it.

Last edited by Luke Plaizier; 29-11-2012 at 11:19 PM.
Luke Plaizier is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-11-2012, 11:13 PM   #2
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default Re: New Sabre Jet/Rocket Engine vs Liquid LPG Injectors

I doubt it. The temperature differences between the 2 systems are pretty extreme.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-11-2012, 11:18 PM   #3
Luke Plaizier
Lukeyson
Donating Member1
 
Luke Plaizier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW
Posts: 2,580
Default Re: New Sabre Jet/Rocket Engine vs Liquid LPG Injectors

You doubt that the Sabre uses a non-metallic heat exchanger?

Do continue.....


Lukeyson
__________________
If the human brain was simple enough to understand, we'd be too simple to understand it.
Luke Plaizier is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-11-2012, 11:41 PM   #4
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default Re: New Sabre Jet/Rocket Engine vs Liquid LPG Injectors

I'm not saying that, just that the temp differences between both applications would be massive, so its hard to see how one relates to the other.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 08:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL