Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16-02-2007, 05:16 PM   #31
GK
Walking with God
 
GK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,321
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

Mercury Silver Fairmont Ghia Wagon. Mmmmmmmm!

GK
__________________
2009 Mondeo Zetec TDCi - Moondust Silver

2015 Kia Sorento Platinum - Snow White Pearl

2001 Ducati Monster 900Sie - Red

Now gone!
1999 AU1 Futura Wagon - Sparkling Burgundy
On LPG



Want a Full Life? John 10:10
GK is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-02-2007, 05:41 PM   #32
charles_wif_xf
Purveyor of filth
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 05MkIIFutura
Nup if you ask me, I want a solid rear axle. Nothing holds the road with a bit of weight like the live axle. Tyre wear is superb as well. Not to mention weight. IRS just shrinks up into the wells and wallows all over the road when it has weight on it.
Good point there. Maybe the ar$e end is modular, ie able to take both suspension solutions.
charles_wif_xf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-02-2007, 05:42 PM   #33
MAGPIE
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MAGPIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Shakey Isles
Posts: 3,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GK
Mercury Silver Fairmont Ghia Wagon. Mmmmmmmm!

GK
+ Turbo and I'm sold :
MAGPIE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-02-2007, 07:54 PM   #34
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Guess ford found a market for them, because the wagon was in serious doubt of getting redesigned.
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 16-02-2007, 11:13 PM   #35
[Tonko]
What's green is gold
 
[Tonko]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Shepparton
Posts: 3,079
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAGPIE
+ Turbo and I'm sold :
but in black, with the china beige / white leather.... booiiiiiinnnnngggg
__________________

EF XR8 - Koni's - Cam and Headwork -3.9s - Ex VIC TMU -


1982 Nissan Patrol - 460 ci Big Block soon - Semi Gloss Black - Dark Tint - 4x 6" Infinity Kappa Perfect Splits - 5" Kappa 2 ways - Kappa 6x9's - 2x12" Kappa perfect subs - 2x4 Channel and 2x Mono Kappa amps-


[Tonko] is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-02-2007, 12:11 AM   #36
P6LTD351
Blue Blood
 
P6LTD351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SA
Posts: 1,507
Default

Why are people worrying that the orion will carry the BA-BF rear-ends?? Orion will be a NEW generation. Just like XD - XF, EA-EL, AU - BF. I'm sick of people thinking that the BA-BF is a different generation to the AU. The BFII is the final evolution of the AU. Just like the VZ commy was the final evolution of the VT. GEEZ it frustrates me!!! Therefore of course the rear end of the Orion wagon will be different!!! Holden have had it over Ford in ALL wagon variants going right back to the HQ. The Holden rear ends all look compact and refined whereas the falcon rear-ends look like a never ending expanse that hasn't been refined.
P6LTD351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-02-2007, 12:36 AM   #37
XR Martin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XR Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 8,969
Default

I think theres a good chance the BF wagon will continue and not be based on the Orion. Look how long the XF series ute ran, it wasnt until 1998 that it was completely replaced.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170

2004 BA wagon RTV project.

1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red

1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired

1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project.
XR Martin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-02-2007, 12:37 AM   #38
LeadFoot81
_Oo===oO_
 
LeadFoot81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,305
Default

XD to XF and EA-EL wagons looked great! it was with AU that Ford lost the plot.
LeadFoot81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-02-2007, 12:37 AM   #39
XR Martin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XR Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 8,969
Default

BTW, didnt the VT-VZ Commo wagons have a larger cargo area than the AU-BFs? So if thats the case there is no excuse for it looking the way it does.

EDIT: AU-BF Falcon Wagon 2584L with rear seats folded, VT-VY 2752L.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170

2004 BA wagon RTV project.

1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red

1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired

1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project.

Last edited by XR Martin; 17-02-2007 at 12:48 AM.
XR Martin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-02-2007, 01:00 AM   #40
red_october
Go on, be a monkey....
 
red_october's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Perth
Posts: 220
Default

Now that's a bit of good news - I have always loved wagons since I was a kid. Hope they make a Ghia version of it with mag wheels and twin exhausts.
red_october is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-02-2007, 12:27 PM   #41
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR6 Martin
I think theres a good chance the BF wagon will continue and not be based on the Orion. Look how long the XF series ute ran, it wasnt until 1998 that it was completely replaced.
More likely. Drive are a joke, the headline that a new wagon is confirmed is totally misleading. No where in that story does Tom Gorman say they are making a new wagon. They have just made an assumption.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-02-2007, 05:24 PM   #42
Airmon
King of the Fairy's.
 
Airmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CeeeeeTown.
Posts: 5,093
Default

No way an FPV Wagon would work. However, if a Fairmont wagon is released, consider it bought
Airmon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-02-2007, 10:44 PM   #43
irsa76
Snoopping
 
irsa76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In front of the 'puter
Posts: 626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vztrt
Guess ford found a market for them, because the wagon was in serious doubt of getting redesigned.
Considering the VT wagon was designed around Telstra requirments when Holden had the supply contract, I would have thought that as long as Telstra was buying Falcons a new wagon was a given. Hopefully the new wagon will be as clever as the Territory for internal storage.
irsa76 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 17-02-2007, 11:04 PM   #44
BFXR8Silhouette
Nate
 
BFXR8Silhouette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Regional WA
Posts: 65
Default

V8 wagon & I'm sold. As long as it has a decent interior. I can get a bodykit later. If the SS wagon comes back and we dont have a direct competitor I'm off to the red team. (I'll be about having kids age shortly and will need a wagon)
BFXR8Silhouette is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-02-2007, 08:22 AM   #45
Dr Smith
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melb.
Posts: 4,457
Default

As the owner of a BA Futura and Territory maybe I could give some comments/opinions.
Where the wagon is clearly superior:
rear cargo length and lower loading height
more economical
cheaper to buy but less features/specs
Territory advantage:
has full active/passive saftey features available (big one here)
looks better (subjective), can come in ghia spec
far better use of space in passenger cabin.
driving position is brilliant, the a-pilller/sun-visor profile is worth the money diff.
out-handles wagon (1st roundabout shows this) and rides better, no rear axle hop mid corner especially...
comes in turbo to keep VE-driving reps at bay...

so as you can see the Territory is the "better" vehicle unless you need to carry long loads in the rear...
Ford have to redesign the rear, the EL tailgate/tail-light design and the side profile of the X series were the 2 best features of past wagons.

I feel the past effort Ford put into the wagons (and LWB models) was justified internally on the basis of AU sales and that was hugely effected by the looks of AU versus the looks of VT combined with the pricing structure to fleets/ EL resale etc...plus designing a Territory that was to have a ghia spec. If the AU had of been more successful, more effort would have been given to these models and so on...
Dr Smith is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-02-2007, 08:45 AM   #46
MAGPIE
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MAGPIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Shakey Isles
Posts: 3,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Smith
As the owner of a BA Futura and Territory maybe I could give some comments/opinions.
Where the wagon is clearly superior:
rear cargo length and lower loading height
more economical
cheaper to buy but less features/specs
Territory advantage:
has full active/passive saftey features available (big one here)
looks better (subjective), can come in ghia spec
far better use of space in passenger cabin.
driving position is brilliant, the a-pilller/sun-visor profile is worth the money diff.
out-handles wagon (1st roundabout shows this) and rides better, no rear axle hop mid corner especially...
comes in turbo to keep VE-driving reps at bay...

so as you can see the Territory is the "better" vehicle unless you need to carry long loads in the rear...
Ford have to redesign the rear, the EL tailgate/tail-light design and the side profile of the X series were the 2 best features of past wagons.

I feel the past effort Ford put into the wagons (and LWB models) was justified internally on the basis of AU sales and that was hugely effected by the looks of AU versus the looks of VT combined with the pricing structure to fleets/ EL resale etc...plus designing a Territory that was to have a ghia spec. If the AU had of been more successful, more effort would have been given to these models and so on...
Not really a fair comparison, the wagon(199?) is essentially years older than the Territory(2004), a brand new wagon design with all the modern safety features, coil springs and IRS would be a fairer comparison.
MAGPIE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-02-2007, 08:45 AM   #47
Bucknaked
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Bucknaked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 11,647
Default

At least give us an XR Wagon in 6, 6T and 8
__________________
FG2 XR6T
KIA Cerato
2022 Kawasaki Z900
Bucknaked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-02-2007, 08:50 AM   #48
MAGPIE
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MAGPIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Shakey Isles
Posts: 3,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucknaked
At least give us an XR Wagon in 6, 6T and 8
As long as it's completely new, not a AU/BA/BF rehash :
MAGPIE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-02-2007, 08:57 AM   #49
Bucknaked
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Bucknaked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 11,647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAGPIE
As long as it's completely new, not a AU/BA/BF rehash :
Couldn't see them doing it now before the new model comes out. Would be nice to see it happen in 08.
__________________
FG2 XR6T
KIA Cerato
2022 Kawasaki Z900
Bucknaked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-02-2007, 12:06 PM   #50
Airmon
King of the Fairy's.
 
Airmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CeeeeeTown.
Posts: 5,093
Default

A Falcon Wagon, In Ghia spec and factory Turbo.....now we're talking :P
Airmon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-02-2007, 12:44 PM   #51
banarcus
hmm eyebrows
 
banarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lower Hunter Valley, NSW
Posts: 2,393
Default

Hmm you never know if Ford will just do a frank-en-wagon. Orion front end and AU rear. It's been done before with the frank-en-ute hasn't it?
__________________
XE 4.9 Falcon S & XA 4.9 Fairmont hardtop
banarcus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-02-2007, 02:51 PM   #52
El_Poochino
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vic or NSW, depends on the bill :P
Posts: 310
Default

Probally due for a new rear end. EA end went through to EL and AU to BF.

Let FPV tinker with the wagon. The ultimate sleeper at the traffic light wars, the rice bags won't see the wagon comming... won't belive it either.
El_Poochino is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-02-2007, 04:28 PM   #53
3vXT
...
 
3vXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,046
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Smith
out-handles wagon (1st roundabout shows this)
you cant be serious???

i would have a territory over a similar spec'd wagon for a number of reasons but handling and roundabouts are not one of them.
fair enough they may "ride" better and in general probably be more comfortable but push a territory around a roundabout at speed and it carrys more body roll than my 14yo eb.
not suggesting a wagon is going to be the ultimate handling weapon, but if your going to stick up for the territory and are comparing it to a wagon, i wouldn't mention roundabouts.
3vXT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-02-2007, 06:25 PM   #54
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Stationwagon
Considering the VT wagon was designed around Telstra requirments when Holden had the supply contract, I would have thought that as long as Telstra was buying Falcons a new wagon was a given. Hopefully the new wagon will be as clever as the Territory for internal storage.
Even with the Telstra sales it dosn't sell enough numbers.
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-02-2007, 09:07 PM   #55
GXL078
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
GXL078's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,652
Default

Mitsu 380 would be a good sized wagon. I could own one of those. Updated front on the latest BF (as seen in article) is a step backwards. Very AU series 3 ish.
GXL078 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-02-2007, 10:48 PM   #56
outback_ute
Ute Forum Moderator
Contributing Member
 
outback_ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb
Posts: 7,227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken2903
not sure about the number of the choices but i was under the impression that they didn't make any after the BA series 1.

i cant remember what month the series 1 BA's ended, does anyone have a newer wagon than that???
Jan 07 BF2 new enough for you?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozfords
They need an RTV varient of the wagooon!
See below - not mine though! Done with RTV bits plus a custom shackle mount
Attached Images
File Type: jpg RTV wagon.JPG (17.3 KB, 85 views)
outback_ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2007, 04:44 AM   #57
Bobman
Regulator
 
Bobman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,168
Default

Why are people here saying an Orion wagon would have a BA rear end? That's just stupid.

Every completely new model in the Falcon Wagon range had new styling (front and rear).

Someone mentioned ute's, that's fine, but it doesn't relate to the Wagon topic, which have always changed rear ends at each new model. As others have said, the BA was not a completely new model, but simply an evolution of the AU, exactly why 2007 Commodore wagons share the same rear end with the 1998 versions.

I think leaf springs would be retained, as the pro's outweigh the cons given the market that buys this sort of vehicle.
__________________
Regards
Bobby

Current Cars:
2000 AU2 Fairmont (2019-current)
2003 BA1 Falcon Divvy Van (2017-current)
2009 VW Mk6 Golf 118TSi (2020-current)
Previous Cars:
2003 MCX10R Avalon VXi (2017-2020)
1995 EF1 Falcon GLi (2016-2019)
1997 XH2 Falcon Van OPT20 (2016-2019)
2006 BF Fairlane Ghia (2013-2018)
2001 AU3 Futura (2010-2013)
1996 EL Fairmont (2008-2010)
2004 BA XR6 (2005-2008)
2001 AU2 Forte (2005-2006)
1988 EA Fairmont Ghia (2003-2005)
1984 AR Telstar TX5 Ghia (2001-2005)
Bobman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2007, 10:34 AM   #58
LeadFoot81
_Oo===oO_
 
LeadFoot81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,305
Default

Ppl are saying the AU-BF rear end might stay, because Ford are so cash strapped at the moment, and even if there is a market for wagons, its not as big as it used to be.
LeadFoot81 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2007, 01:16 PM   #59
Bobman
Regulator
 
Bobman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inline6
Ppl are saying the AU-BF rear end might stay, because Ford are so cash strapped at the moment, and even if there is a market for wagons, its not as big as it used to be.
It won't stay though, as it's a completely new model, Ford have been more cash strapped in the past, ie XD or even EA to an extent.

I agree about the market thing, but I highly doubt it will have the same rear design as the current wagons.

All of this is of course based on a rumour from an unreputable website, like many other motoring journals who don't know what a camshaft is, let's wait until we hear proper confirmation from Ford itself.
__________________
Regards
Bobby

Current Cars:
2000 AU2 Fairmont (2019-current)
2003 BA1 Falcon Divvy Van (2017-current)
2009 VW Mk6 Golf 118TSi (2020-current)
Previous Cars:
2003 MCX10R Avalon VXi (2017-2020)
1995 EF1 Falcon GLi (2016-2019)
1997 XH2 Falcon Van OPT20 (2016-2019)
2006 BF Fairlane Ghia (2013-2018)
2001 AU3 Futura (2010-2013)
1996 EL Fairmont (2008-2010)
2004 BA XR6 (2005-2008)
2001 AU2 Forte (2005-2006)
1988 EA Fairmont Ghia (2003-2005)
1984 AR Telstar TX5 Ghia (2001-2005)
Bobman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-02-2007, 05:18 PM   #60
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Since the wagon only really sells to fleets there's no way it will be all new. Thats the only reason it is staying on, it would be lucky if it even got a facelift.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL