Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26-04-2011, 01:26 AM   #211
SteveJH
No longer a Uni student..
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Posts: 2,557
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

It doesnt flow with the rest of their lineup though, the way I suggest does. A 'Titanium' no matter the engine would be instantly recognisable as the top of the range model, with a E6, G6...it could mean anything.

When i talk about an 'ecoboost' or 'ecoLPI' badge, i'm suggesting that if such a badge was used, it would be a small badge underneath the 'trim' badge, it would not be part of the car model/specification name.
SteveJH is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 01:33 AM   #212
Buntz
Straight Eight
 
Buntz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveJH
It doesnt flow with the rest of their lineup though, the way I suggest does. A 'Titanium' no matter the engine would be instantly recognisable as the top of the range model, with a E6, G6...it could mean anything.

When i talk about an 'ecoboost' or 'ecoLPI' badge, i'm suggesting that if such a badge was used, it would be a small badge underneath the 'trim' badge, it would not be part of the car model/specification name.
Everyone quotes the badge names.

G = Base models.
E = Luxury models.
XR = Sports models

4, 6, 8 = Cylinders.

T = Turbo.

It's as simple as ABC, 123.
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon.
Buntz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 06:20 AM   #213
DJR-351
I am Groot
Donating Member3
 
DJR-351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Burnett Heads, Qld
Posts: 6,840
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buntz93ED
Everyone quotes the badge names.
Do you mind not speaking for me............
__________________
..
McLaren F1
Dick Johnson Racing

"Those were the days when the cars were cars, they weren't built out of an Ikea pack like they are now and clothed in plastic; they were real cars." John Bowe
DJR-351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 07:29 AM   #214
MAGPIE
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MAGPIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Shakey Isles
Posts: 3,428
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveJH
And you think having a titanium option would be expensive??

XT
Zetec (G6 spec equiv, either I4t or I6).
Titanium (G6E spec equiv, either I4t, I6 or I6t)

Offer S (sports) pack with the above which would give XR side skirts & spoiler with the normal front for the model.

XR6 (with the turbo only)
XR8 (N/A Coyote)

XT &/or Zetec with the S pack would replace the N/A XR6.
Zetec... are you nuts

Why would you give the Falcon the name of an old Focus engine/model
MAGPIE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 08:31 AM   #215
2011G6E
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
2011G6E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: On The Footplate.
Posts: 5,086
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

I've given up and just started saying "we own a Fairmont" when people ask me what we drive...I got sick of the blank looks when I simply say "we drive a G6E"...the usual response is "what's that then..?". You say "Fairmont" and immediately they know where it stands in the lineup...even non-Ford people know the name.

It's pointless trying to be all trendy and European about giving a car a couple of numbers and letters to identify it. The makers who do this have always done it...Mazda, BMW, Mercedes...and people already know what they mean.

It's very hard to completely rebrand something and expect the public to automatically know what you are on about...

Size is another thing...when we took our G6E in for it's first service, they loaned us a Mondeo automatic turbo diesel...and in all honestly, if we'd test driven one of them before the Falcon, I suspect we'd have one in the driveway now instead of the Falcon. It's just too close in interior space, and the Falcon can't beat the economy of the TD motor which is a pearler.
2011G6E is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 11:51 AM   #216
Buntz
Straight Eight
 
Buntz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2011G6E
I've given up and just started saying "we own a Fairmont" when people ask me what we drive...I got sick of the blank looks when I simply say "we drive a G6E"...the usual response is "what's that then..?". You say "Fairmont" and immediately they know where it stands in the lineup...even non-Ford people know the name.

It's pointless trying to be all trendy and European about giving a car a couple of numbers and letters to identify it. The makers who do this have always done it...Mazda, BMW, Mercedes...and people already know what they mean.

It's very hard to completely rebrand something and expect the public to automatically know what you are on about...

Size is another thing...when we took our G6E in for it's first service, they loaned us a Mondeo automatic turbo diesel...and in all honestly, if we'd test driven one of them before the Falcon, I suspect we'd have one in the driveway now instead of the Falcon. It's just too close in interior space, and the Falcon can't beat the economy of the TD motor which is a pearler.
Mmmm. Falcon needs work, really need to separate itself from Mondeo. It's not easy trying to fight in a market, fighting in your own brand is worse though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJR-351
Do you mind not speaking for me............
So sorry.
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon.
Buntz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 12:24 PM   #217
DJR-351
I am Groot
Donating Member3
 
DJR-351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Burnett Heads, Qld
Posts: 6,840
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buntz93ED
So sorry.
Thank you, apology accepted.....
__________________
..
McLaren F1
Dick Johnson Racing

"Those were the days when the cars were cars, they weren't built out of an Ikea pack like they are now and clothed in plastic; they were real cars." John Bowe
DJR-351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 12:35 PM   #218
Buntz
Straight Eight
 
Buntz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJR-351
Thank you, apology accepted.....
HA!
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon.
Buntz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 04:01 PM   #219
svo supporter
Fixing Ford's **** ups
 
svo supporter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 4,759
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Start throwing all these different numbers, letters etc for trim/engine configuation levels, you'll end up back round the 70's, where the option game was ripe.

We all know what happened after that. Every poor bugger was so confused, they didn't know whether they had a small 6 cyl, with carpet or a whopping big V8 with vinyl floor coverings.

Apply the KISS system and surely it's save headaches when it comes to buying a car.
__________________
A wheel alignment fixes everything, when it comes to front end issues. This includes any little noises.



Please read the manual carefully, as the these manufacturers spent millions of dollars making sure it is perfect.....Now why are there so many problems with my car, when I follow the instructions to the letter?....Answer, majority rules round here


Lock me up and throw away the key because I'm a hoon....I got caught doing 59 in a 60 zone
svo supporter is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 04:58 PM   #220
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 48,786
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buntz93ED
XR6 is awesome. It has everything you'd need. Don't be a tool Damo.
LOL, yeah so awesome that when I went to open the bonnet on a new XR6 Falcon in the dealership, the latch snapped off in my hand.

Not only do they have fit and finish issues, everything in the interior is low quality.
Franco Cozzo is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 06:10 PM   #221
Ford_The_Win
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,730
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Damo
Not only do they have fit and finish issues, everything in the interior is low quality.
This is true. Falcons have always have had lacklustre build quality. The interior quality in my Falcon isn't great in comparison to Aurions and Camrys I have been in. All the trim around the rear window is flimsy and falling apart, despite the car being garaged all it's life in a cool climate. The newer B-series and FGs are even worse. BUT despite that, no Magna or Camry could ever match the Falcon for ride comfort, smoothness and solid road stance.
__________________
2011 FG XR6 Sedan
Ford_The_Win is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 06:28 PM   #222
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,216
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

This is also why i believe that building Mondeo locally would help to better align
Falcon trim and equipment levels to more like those expected on international cars.
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 06:32 PM   #223
DJM83
Barra Turbo > V8
Donating Member3
 
DJM83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 25,458
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buntz93ED
XR6 is awesome. It has everything you'd need. Don't be a tool Damo.
Hahahahaha awesome, your funny.
__________________
2011 XR6 Turbo Ute
- Manual
- Lux Pack
- Twin 2.5" Stainless Exhaust
- Antz Turboside Intake
- CCForged Phatlux wheels
- Tuned by LS Tuning and Performance
DJM83 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 08:35 PM   #224
stang65
FPRJET
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,143
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Damo
LOL, yeah so awesome that when I went to open the bonnet on a new XR6 Falcon in the dealership, the latch snapped off in my hand.

Not only do they have fit and finish issues, everything in the interior is low quality.

Yeah but at least in 5 years time it won`t be one of those four cylinders blowing smoke that I always end up sitting behind in traffic.
stang65 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 09:32 PM   #225
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 48,786
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by stang65
Yeah but at least in 5 years time it won`t be one of those four cylinders blowing smoke that I always end up sitting behind in traffic.
At least it just blows smoke, not head gaskets right?

Yes, I know that issue was fixed when the AU came out, but he also took a generalisation.

I've got two neglected 4 cylinder cars right here at home, and none of them have had any expensive engine issues in the 12 and 8 years we've owned them.
Franco Cozzo is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 09:50 PM   #226
stang65
FPRJET
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,143
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Pffft , i had my ED Falcon for 8 years never missed a beat. never a blew a head gasket. To blow a head gasket you either sit in peak hour traffic with the aircon on on a 40 degree day or you don`t maintain your hoses.

Any of the inline 6 engines will be around long after the four is dead and buried. The fact that they use them for Taxi`s shows how bullet proof they are. you save fuel with a four cylinder but you pay that back in repairs.

Don`t look at the fact it`s new lets look at it when it has 150,000 k`s on it.
In saying that I understand your happy with your car, I almost bought one as a cheap run about, but in my opinion it just isn`t a family car and can`t compete in alot of areas.
stang65 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 10:15 PM   #227
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 48,786
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by stang65
Pffft , i had my ED Falcon for 8 years never missed a beat. never a blew a head gasket. To blow a head gasket you either sit in peak hour traffic with the aircon on on a 40 degree day or you don`t maintain your hoses.

Any of the inline 6 engines will be around long after the four is dead and buried. The fact that they use them for Taxi`s shows how bullet proof they are. you save fuel with a four cylinder but you pay that back in repairs.

Don`t look at the fact it`s new lets look at it when it has 150,000 k`s on it.
In saying that I understand your happy with your car, I almost bought one as a cheap run about, but in my opinion it just isn`t a family car and can`t compete in alot of areas.
We've had an XE and an EA Falcon, they both ended up in the scrap heap, BOTH of their engines where dead with less than 300,000km on the clock. The EA got replaced with a Mazda 323 which has been faultless to this day and it hasn't had a nice life.

Our cars have 275,000 and 245,000 on them at the moment with no major repairs to either.

The last time I got in a Falcon Taxi it was making squeaking and grinding noises, smelt like vomit and was falling apart. The only reason they use Falcons is because they can pick them up very cheap at auctions, if the Falcon was so awesome as a Taxi, why are there a LOT of Civic Hybrids and Prius' getting around in yellow now?

We can fit our family comfortably in my Focus, Mum's Festiva or Dad's 323 without issue. Its not uncomfortable for 4 people.

I'd put money on my diesel 4 cylinder engine outlasting your ED I6 any day. Also have two workmates, one with an early 90s Subaru Liberty and the other a 1990 Honda Integra, both on original engines and both over 500,000km.
Franco Cozzo is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 10:19 PM   #228
Polyal
Virtuous Bogan (TM)
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,521
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

LOL so many incorrect stereotypes going on here. Running costs are basically the biggest factor in cabs...so would you buy a taxi thats inefficient to run? Taxis are tools of the trade and they are treated like so.

But hey, maybe people should go over to Europe and tell BMW, Merc et al that its not good for their image. Its a rubbish excuse.
__________________
  • 2023 Mitsubishi Triton
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 10:19 PM   #229
stang65
FPRJET
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,143
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Wow 275,000 k`s whoopees there 6 cylinder falcons that have had over 800,000 clocked on them. Anyway were going to far off topic enjoy.
stang65 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-04-2011, 11:58 PM   #230
Ford_The_Win
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,730
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Damo
We've had an XE and an EA Falcon, they both ended up in the scrap heap, BOTH of their engines where dead with less than 300,000km on the clock. The EA got replaced with a Mazda 323 which has been faultless to this day and it hasn't had a nice life.
Our Mazda 323 carked it at 175,000 with a transmission that turned into mechanno, 2 head gaskets and the 1.6 eventually seized up. My old EA was still running like a Swiss watch with 308,000 on the clock.

Quote:
We can fit our family comfortably in my Focus, Mum's Festiva or Dad's 323 without issue. Its not uncomfortable for 4 people.
I'd find it hard to fit myself into a Festiva let alone 4 people. Imagine doing a Melbourne to Sydney run in a Festiva!

Quote:
I'd put money on my diesel 4 cylinder engine outlasting your ED I6 any day.
When you get to work rebuilding that I6 you will change your mind, Damo.
__________________
2011 FG XR6 Sedan
Ford_The_Win is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-04-2011, 05:25 AM   #231
kpcart
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 296
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

my answer to the thread question, are we being too harsh and critical of ford australia:
in my oppinion no, but we as a community are buying the low number of fords we are buying because of fords crap marketing and image. holden has a better image and marketing, and as such "we - the masses" are buying more commodores then stodgy image falcons. the falcon may be slightly better, but the masses buying the cars dont know the technicalities of what they are buying, they buy what comes across as a better buy, and with the marketing, holdens seem a better buy then fords to the majority of new car buyers. i think a lot of people know that the holden drivetrian isnt as good as the falcons, but it is more then good enough, and is accompanied by a bloody good looking body that ford couldnt beat or even match.
kpcart is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-04-2011, 09:56 AM   #232
2011G6E
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
2011G6E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: On The Footplate.
Posts: 5,086
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

To the original question:

Sometimes they deserve it. I work with a guy who owns a G6E turbo, and after we bought our G6E, he paused and said "what do you think of some of the interior details...?", and only having had the car for a couple of days, I said "Well they look great, why?", and he cryptically said "Get back to me in a week".

I worked with him a week or two later, and we got to chatting about our cars. I knew what he meant.
For a $50,000+ car, there are a lot of things inside that just wouldn't cut it in a $18,000 Corolla. Passenger handles above the doors just "clack" back into place with no soft-return (but oddly the glovebox has one), the center console lid just slams back down with a bang with no padding or soft close. The gearshift lockout lever on the 6 speed box just feels "plasticky", and almost feels like you may be about to break it if you don't squeeze it into place gently, the sun visors don't seem to stay down without drooping...little stuff like that, but they are details people notice...expecially when you've paid a large premium for a near-top of the line car.
As for under the bonnet, I've mentioned Fords sterling decision to save a couple of bucks per car by not painting the bare iron engine blocks anymore, resulting in ugly surface-rusted engines in what is otherwise a pretty neat and tidy underbonnet. I know a lot of people don't bother to look under the hood, but a lot of us like a nice clean engine bay...

Ford needs to remember that not everyone is totally, absolutely, one-eyed brand loyal, not like they used to be some time back. There's just too many good contenders on the market just waiting to take a sale from Ford with sharp pricing and good value for money...and yes, little details that make all the difference to the driving experience.

Last edited by 2011G6E; 27-04-2011 at 10:05 AM.
2011G6E is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-04-2011, 12:38 PM   #233
stang65
FPRJET
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,143
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Damo
We've had an XE and an EA Falcon, they both ended up in the scrap heap, BOTH of their engines where dead with less than 300,000km on the clock. The EA got replaced with a Mazda 323 which has been faultless to this day and it hasn't had a nice life.

Our cars have 275,000 and 245,000 on them at the moment with no major repairs to either.

The last time I got in a Falcon Taxi it was making squeaking and grinding noises, smelt like vomit and was falling apart. The only reason they use Falcons is because they can pick them up very cheap at auctions, if the Falcon was so awesome as a Taxi, why are there a LOT of Civic Hybrids and Prius' getting around in yellow now?

We can fit our family comfortably in my Focus, Mum's Festiva or Dad's 323 without issue. Its not uncomfortable for 4 people.

I'd put money on my diesel 4 cylinder engine outlasting your ED I6 any day. Also have two workmates, one with an early 90s Subaru Liberty and the other a 1990 Honda Integra, both on original engines and both over 500,000km.


that was had an ED Falcon, Have had my trouble free XR6 turbo for the past 7 years, the Ed was purring like a kittty when i sold it. Just thought i would correct that little bit.
stang65 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-04-2011, 07:16 PM   #234
Grunter
Not of the Sooty variety!
Donating Member3
 
Grunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On a Shrinking Planet
Posts: 1,817
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by kpcart
my answer to the thread question, are we being too harsh and critical of ford australia:
in my oppinion no, but we as a community are buying the low number of fords we are buying because of fords crap marketing and image. holden has a better image and marketing, and as such "we - the masses" are buying more commodores then stodgy image falcons. the falcon may be slightly better, but the masses buying the cars dont know the technicalities of what they are buying, they buy what comes across as a better buy, and with the marketing, holdens seem a better buy then fords to the majority of new car buyers. i think a lot of people know that the holden drivetrian isnt as good as the falcons, but it is more then good enough, and is accompanied by a bloody good looking body that ford couldnt beat or even match.
I think the FG is one of the nicest looking shapes there's been out of the falcon commodore. I don't think the look is an issue at all but more so the great marketing Holden have had for quite a number of years now. Ford are getting a lot better but still need to find a campain that grabs and sticks with consumers.
__________________
"To be afraid is to be alive - to act against that fear is to be a person of courage."


Current
The Toy: 2002 AUIII TS50
The Daily and Tow Vehicle: 2016 VW Amarok
Grunter is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-04-2011, 07:24 PM   #235
phillyc
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
phillyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 3,246
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Always factual and beneficial. 
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grunter
I think the FG is one of the nicest looking shapes there's been out of the falcon commodore. I don't think the look is an issue at all but more so the great marketing Holden have had for quite a number of years now. Ford are getting a lot better but still need to find a campain that grabs and sticks with consumers.
I agree. The FG shape is really sleek. The problem is not the shape. It is the marketing and customer service which has really lacked.

Right now, Ford are at a low with locally built vehicles from a sales point of view. It is at it's worst right now. This will get better with SZ Territory sales having a full month in June. EcoLPi in Q3. FG2 in Q3/Q4. Possibly XR8 with FG2. EcoBoost FG2 in January 2012.

Then the imported T6 Ranger in Q3/4. EcoBoost Mondeo in Q2/Q3. Gen3 Focus in Q3/Q4.

Only Transit will not receive an update AFAIK. That is the 85% new or substantially renewed in 2011 that Ford has promised.
__________________
BA2 XR8 Rapid M6 Ute - Lid - Tint -18s
226.8rwkW@178kmh/537Nm@140kmh 1/9/2013
14.2@163kmh 23/10/2013

Boss349 built. Not yet run. Waiting on a shell.

Retrotech thread
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...1363569&page=6
phillyc is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-04-2011, 08:02 PM   #236
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 48,786
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford_The_Win
Our Mazda 323 carked it at 175,000 with a transmission that turned into mechanno, 2 head gaskets and the 1.6 eventually seized up. My old EA was still running like a Swiss watch with 308,000 on the clock.



I'd find it hard to fit myself into a Festiva let alone 4 people. Imagine doing a Melbourne to Sydney run in a Festiva!



When you get to work rebuilding that I6 you will change your mind, Damo.
Well there you go, different experiences all around.

And yes, I still haven't pulled it down.
Franco Cozzo is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-04-2011, 08:17 PM   #237
SteveJH
No longer a Uni student..
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Posts: 2,557
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

EL GLi.

Parents got it with ~40,000 on the clock. I've been driving it the last few years. From memory.

- Autotransmission
- About 4 exhausts?
- Oil switch of some kind (started spewing oil out the back of the car all over the grand parents caravan at 6am on the way back from bathhurst)
- Head gasket

There is more but those are the ones I can think of straight away. Ticked over 238,000km on the weekend, now halfway to 239,000.....
SteveJH is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-04-2011, 03:48 PM   #238
08ESE
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 237
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

got one in the driveway here (el), 289 thou kays, been treated like ****, runs like a clock. seen many a taxi with around a million kays still going.


personally, ford is killing the falcon, no adds, no updates, they give no **** for it, someone at the blue oval wants it gone, and sadly, thats the way its going. the falcon is the LAST thing on fords mind, they are behind every other car they sell here with adds, updates etc.... seems they have thrown the towel into holden on the large sedan market, and will take the fight to them in every other segment.

ford wants taurus all over the world, falcon was in its way.....


was, its not any more.



( i hope im wrong, but im pretty sure im not )
08ESE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-04-2011, 05:57 PM   #239
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,216
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by kpcart
my answer to the thread question, are we being too harsh and critical of ford australia:
in my oppinion no, but we as a community are buying the low number of fords we are buying because of fords crap marketing and image. holden has a better image and marketing, and as such "we - the masses" are buying more commodores then stodgy image falcons. the falcon may be slightly better, but the masses buying the cars dont know the technicalities of what they are buying, they buy what comes across as a better buy, and with the marketing, holdens seem a better buy then fords to the majority of new car buyers. i think a lot of people know that the holden drivetrian isnt as good as the falcons, but it is more then good enough, and is accompanied by a bloody good looking body that ford couldnt beat or even match.
It is true that Commodore is outselling Falcon by a wide margin, I think it has less to do
with private buyers and more to do with a shift in preference by fleet buyers unable
to get LPG Falcons and wagons, that just sends those buyers off to other products.
If indeed LPG engines should be making up a third or quarter of all sales then that is
a huge implied uptick in sales of between 30 to 50% of current production and would
suggest that the current 1800 (or less) sales should be 2400-2700 with LPG sedans.

You know what?
We'll know soon enough if Ford's belief in LPG is right or not, if those sales come back
then I think the case for another RWD Falcon strengthens but if those sales are indifferent
then I think Ford has to seriously revisit its business plan for a future Falcon but that doesn't
mean another Falcon won't happen, probably more like a big rethink of what's in and what's out.
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-04-2011, 09:54 PM   #240
P6LTD351
Blue Blood
 
P6LTD351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SA
Posts: 1,507
Default Re: Are We Being Too Harsh And Critial Of Ford Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
It is true that Commodore is outselling Falcon by a wide margin, I think it has less to do
with private buyers and more to do with a shift in preference by fleet buyers unable
to get LPG Falcons and wagons, that just sends those buyers off to other products.
If indeed LPG engines should be making up a third or quarter of all sales then that is
a huge implied uptick in sales of between 30 to 50% of current production and would
suggest that the current 1800 (or less) sales should be 2400-2700 with LPG sedans.

You know what?
We'll know soon enough if Ford's belief in LPG is right or not, if those sales come back
then I think the case for another RWD Falcon strengthens but if those sales are indifferent
then I think Ford has to seriously revisit its business plan for a future Falcon but that doesn't
mean another Falcon won't happen, probably more like a big rethink of what's in and what's out.
Commodore has caned the Falcon in sales for years with or without LPG.

Ford have given up on Falcon. Deal has already been done. Why market and advertise something that's on the way out? They are getting us ready for its departure. Now, I hope I'm horribly wrong but I don't think so.
__________________
The Fleet
1999 AU XR8 4sp adaptive shift, Black, Momo T-bar and S/wheel, Bodykit, 17" wheels, Sunroof - 180Ks - THE DAILY
1995 EF XR8 Manual Heritage Green, Factory Bodykit and FTRs - 126Ks
1986 XF Fairmont Ghia 4.1L EFI Regency Red, trip computer, venetians - 163Ks
1979 P6 LTD 351, Goldust - 185Ks
1989 Mazda MX5, Red 1.6L, 5sp manual - 102Ks
P6LTD351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL