Which is the best mid-size luxury SUV?

Express · 19-12-2015, 01:43 AM

Quote:

Mercedes-Benz GLC v BMW X3 v Range Rover Evoque v Lexus NX

Mercedes-Benz's long-awaited GLC takes on its rivals from BMW, Range Rover and Lexus.

Stephen Ottley
18 December, 2015

The new Mercedes-Benz GLC takes on its main rivals the Range Rover Evoque, BMW X3 and the Lexus NX200t. Photo: Mark Bean

Mercedes-Benz GLC250. Photo: Mark Bean

BMW X3 xDrive28i. Photo: Mark Bean

Range Rover Evoque HSE Dynamic. Photo: Mark Bean

Lexus NX200t. Photo: Mark Bean

Lexus NX200t. Photo: Mark Bean

It has been eight years since Mercedes-Benz launched its mid-size GLK SUV in overseas markets. But, for a number of reasons, Mercedes never put the steering wheel on the right side, so Australians have had to make do with the likes of the BMW X3, Audi Q5, Range Rover Evoque and more recently the Lexus NX for their mid-size luxury SUV needs.

Until now, because Mercedes has finally added the GLK's replacement to its local line-up – the all-new GLC.

See link below for Mercedes-Benz GLC v BMW X3 v Range Rover Evoque v Lexus NX video comparison

Part of Mercedes' revamp of its SUV line-up that will see the 'GL' prefix added to its entire SUV range – from the diminutive GLA to the larger and more luxurious GLS.

The GLC sits between the (A-Class based) GLA and recently launched (ML-Class replacing) GLE in the mix.

It finally gives the brand a direct rival to the BMW X3, Range Rover Evoque and Lexus NX. So we assembled the four mid-size SUVs with similar petrol engines to find out how the new GLC stacks up.

BMW X3 xDrive28i

Earlier this year, we pitted the X3 and Q5 against the new Land Rover Discovery Sport in a diesel-powered contest. The X3 emerged victorious and is back to defend its crown, but this time with a petrol engine under the bonnet.

The xDrive28i is powered by a 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo petrol engine that produces 180kW of power and 350Nm of torque.

That makes it the most powerful engine in our quartet – but only by 3kW – and torque is even between the X3, GLC and NX, with the Evoque only 10Nm behind. So in terms of performance, the X3 doesn't posses any noticeable advantage.

It is paired to an eight-speed automatic transmission that is smooth and extracts the best from the engine.

The xDrive part of its name implies all-wheel-drive but the X3 is an on-road biased SUV, with Hill Descent Control the only nod to getting off-road. The X3 rides on 19-inch alloy wheels with run-flat tyres, so it isn't the pick if you plan on getting your SUV dirty on a regular basis.

But the X3 is poised and dynamic on sealed roads. It does possess excellent road holding, with car-like cornering and communicative steering. However, the trade-off for that is a firm ride from the suspension, and the run-flat tyres don't help, so the X3 lacks the compliance of its rivals.

Inside, the X3 is starting to show its age (this second-generation model was first launched in 2010), with a simpler interior than its rivals.

It still has the typical good BMW build quality, but the design is plain with a lot of black plastic and a small infotainment screen.

But space is good for passengers up front, with supportive seats. Rear room is tighter with only average knee-room, but there is respectable headroom, and the seat is flat and lacks lateral support.

At $74,600, the X3 is the second most expensive car here ($6700 more than the GLC) but is well equipped. Standard gear includes genuine leather upholstery, active cruise control, a 360-degree parking camera, front and rear parking sensors, Bi-Xenon headlights, dual-zone air-conditioning, power tailgate, Bluetooth and a nine-speaker sound system with navigation, 20GB hard drive and DAB+ digital radio.

Safety gear includes six airbags, but it misses out on any of the latest active safety equipment that is become increasingly common. But it does come standard with BMW's Intelligent Emergency Call, which can automatically call the emergency services in the event of an accident.

Range Rover Evoque HSE Dynamic Si4

The British brand has revitalised its smallest model for 2016 with a raft of minor updates and a restructured model range.

There is a new diesel engine from the company's new Ingenium family of motors, but we've got the same 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo petrol engine as found in the old model.

Good for 177kW and 340Nm, it is a punchy engine with good pickup when called on. It is also very quiet and refined, with very little engine noise penetrating the cabin.

In fact very little infiltrates the cabin, making the Evoque feel the most luxurious on road of this group.

However, that premium feel is let down by the nine-speed automatic transmission. With so many ratios to choose from, it can be caught out at times, hesitating and clunking through as it hints for the right cog.

The Evoque wins points back, though, with its well controlled ride. The suspension provides a good mix of responsive handling and good compliance; the cabin feels well insulated from the bumps, even repeated sharper bumps.

Despite its stylish appearance, the Evoque is based on an evolution of the Land Rover Freelander 2 underpinnings, so it remains the most capable off-road of these four. It has Hill Descent Control and Land Rover's Terrain Response System fitted as standard.

Inside, the Evoque looks and feels premium, for the most part. There are some controls borrowed from the Freelander/Discovery Sport but overall the Evoque has a higher level of design, fit and finish than its cheaper siblings.

Where the cabin is a let down is space. The low roofline, that gives it its dramatic look, compromises headroom, especially in the rear, and legroom is also tight in the back.

For this comparison test we could only get the top-of-the-range HSE Dynamic model, which is the most expensive of this quartet and by some margin ($17,478 more than the cheapest model, the NX).

However, it must be said up front that Range Rover offers an Evoque to undercut the GLC and X3 on price. At $67,605, the Evoque SE is well equipped with 18-inch alloys, leather seats, carpet mats, keyless entry, interior mood lighting, power tailgate, navigation, an eight-speaker sound system with an eight-inch infotainment touchscreen, a reversing camera, front and rear parking sensors, lane departure warning and autonomous emergency braking.

Stepping up, the HSE Dynamic brings 19-inch alloys, Oxford leather seats, climate control with air filtration, a 380W Meridian 11-speaker sound system, premium hard drive navigation, head up display, configurable mood lighting, Xenon headlights, front fog lights and unique styling elements, including bonnet vents and front and rear bumpers.

Lexus NX200t F Sport

The Japanese brand famous for hybrids joined the turbocharged petrol engine party earlier this year with this new addition to its NX range.

The 200t engine is only the second engine used by Lexus that isn't also found in a Toyota (after the V10 in the LFA). It is competitive with its European rivals, with 175kW and 350Nm and is a match in the real world too, with good punch and a reasonable quiet and refined soundtrack.

The NX200t is a little behind its rivals in the transmission department, with a six-speed automatic. Although it is smooth on the move, it can be caught out sometimes because of its preference to head for the tallest gear as soon as possible. There can be some noticeable hesitation when you call for a sudden burst of acceleration for overtaking or to push up a hill.

Ride quality in the NX isn't quite up to the standards of its European rivals either. The adaptable sports suspension does a good job of soaking up the bumps but it lacks the road holding of the other three; it tends to move around more and runs out of grip earlier.

It is also the noisiest of this lot, with noticeable tyre roar and wind around the mirrors.

Inside is also not the NX200t's strongest suit, with a very cluttered design. The centre stack is tall, juts out from the dashboard and is festooned with buttons and dials. The materials aren't up to the same standard as the Mercedes and Range Rover either, so overall it lacks the premium feels of its competitors.

Space is a little tight front and rear too, thanks to the large dashboard and sloping roofline.

However, where the NX200t really shines is value. At $63,127 it is $4773 cheaper than the next cheapest here, the Mercedes, and it doesn't skimp on equipment either.

Standard gear includes 18 inch-alloys, navigation, 360-degree parking camera, front and rear parking sensors, power tailgate, keyless ignition, heated and ventilated leather seats, 10-speaker sound system with DAB+ and Bluetooth, blind-spot monitoring with rear cross traffic alert and wireless induction charging capability.

Mercedes-Benz GLC 250

Last and by no means least, we come to the GLC. Based on the same underpinnings as the 2014 Drive Car of the Year winning C-Class sedan, the GLC is built on a solid foundation.

The 2.0-litre turbo four-cylinder is the least powerful here, with 155kW, but packs 350Nm of torque to nullify the advantage of the others.

It has more than enough pulling power to get the GLC moving comfortably. That is helped by the excellent nine-speed automatic transmission.

It is the best execution of a nine-speed auto this tester has experienced. It is well calibrated, getting the most out of the engine in terms of performance and efficiency (the GLC uses the least fuel of this group, but all are between 7.2 and 7.9 litres per 100km) but also remaining responsive. It is smooth both on the move and around town.

The GLC has a clear on-road and sporty bias for an SUV, which translates to excellent handling. The GLC feels responsive and progressive in the bends, but also possess a comfortable and refined ride. The suspension can crash occasionally over sharp edges but otherwise isolates the occupants from the imperfections in the road.

Inside, the cabin features Mercedes' current design philosophy, which means and stylish and sophisticated presentation, with good-quality materials and finish.

Space is the best of this quartet, with good room up front, especially small item storage, and more than adequate rear head, leg and knee room.

At $67,900, the GLC 250 is the second most affordable here and is generously equipped. It comes with 20-inch alloys, genuine leather upholstery, keyless entry, five-speaker sound system with Bluetooth DAB+, navigation, keyless ignition, cruise control, parking assist, front and rear parking sensors, a 360-degree parking camera and nine airbags. You also get a driver assistance package that includes steering assist, cross-traffic alert and active lane-keeping assistance included.

If there is a criticism of the GLC it is despite its SUV body style, it has no real off-road equipment other than its four-wheel drive system and higher ride height. However, if you do want to go off sealed roads in it, you can add the optional Off-Road Engineering Package that includes 19-inch alloys, specific off-road driving modes, Airbody Control suspension, hill descent control, a sump guard and off-road styling tweaks, but that adds $3490 to the price.

Verdict

All four of these SUVs make a good argument in their own way. The BMW is the sportiest, the Range Rover the most stylish and capable off-road, the Lexus the best value and the Mercedes is the most spacious.

In fact, there isn't much to split these four on the surface. All have similar performance and efficiency and are all available in the same price range.

But when you really drill down into the details, a clear winner emerges. Whereas the X3, Evoque and NX all have compromises and an obvious weakness or two, the GLC has no major flaw.

It has good performance, the best fuel economy, a well presented and comfortable cabin, rides and handles well and offers good value.

It proves the old adage that the best things in life are worth waiting for.

Specifications

Mercedes-Benz GLC 250

Price: From $67,900 plus on-road costs

Engine: 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo petrol

Power: 155kW at 5500rpm

Torque: 350Nm at 1200-1400rpm

Transmission: Nine-speed automatic, all-wheel drive

Fuel use: 7.2L/100km

BMW X3 xDrive28i

Price: $74,600 plus on-road costs

Engine: 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo petrol

Power: 180kW at 5000rpm

Torque: 350Nm at 1250-4800rpm

Transmission: Eight-speed automatic, all-wheel drive

Fuel use: 7.3L/100km

Range Rover Evoque HSE Dynamic Si4

Price: From $80,605 plus on-road costs

Engine: 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo petrol

Power: 177kW at 5800rpm

Torque: 340Nm at 1750rpm

Transmission: Nine-speed automatic, all-wheel drive

Fuel use: 7.8L/100km

Lexus NX200t F Sport

Price: From $63,127 plus on-road costs

Engine: 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo petrol

Power: 175kW at 4800-5600rpm

Torque: 350Nm at 1650-4000rpm

Transmission: Six-speed automatic, all-wheel drive

Fuel use: 7.9L/100km

http://www.drive.com.au/new-car-comp...14-glnj7c.html

Brazen · 19-12-2015, 10:31 AM

Those GLCs are going to be everywhere, seems to be better value than the C Class it's based on considering it comes with AWD and SurroundView cameras.

**Giant Cranium** · 19-12-2015, 11:05 AM

I'm looking forward to seeing how the new jag will go. Should sell heaps on looks alone

Brazen · 19-12-2015, 11:06 AM

Some of these have pretty good tow ratings. The petrol GLC is 2.4 tonne, the diesel is 2.5 tonnes

blueoval · 19-12-2015, 11:13 AM

I like the look of the GLC. They are ALL better priced than I thought.

superyob · 19-12-2015, 01:53 PM

An innocent question so don't hurt me!!! What have these SUVs got that a Titanium Kuga (which I assume is in the same class for much less money) does not offer?

Brazen · 19-12-2015, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superyob

An innocent question so don't hurt me!!! What have these SUVs got that a Titanium Kuga (which I assume is in the same class for much less money) does not offer?

I would rate these as probably a bigger class as they are based off things like a C Class Mercedes whereas Kuga is based off a Focus.

Terms of features maybe a not a lot in it. The GLC has lane keeping so it will drive itself around corners and can bring itself to a complete stop then start off again with its Distronic. Also 360 degree cameras and full panoramic roof And 20 inch alloys. Mechanically the merc has more power and torque while using less fuel and with a 2.4 tonne tow rating it also has constant power to all 4 wheels with a rear wheel bias whereas cars like the Kuga are front wheel drive until they detect slip.

The biggest difference is conceptually what they are. The GLC is a C Class on stilts so you get all the build quality, strength, fine materials, refinement and quietness all for several hundred dollars less than the equivalent C Class wagon.

Whereas while the Kuga is also effectively the donar car on stilts, you are paying around an 50% premium over the equivalent Focus.

I actually rate the GLC better value than the mainstream 50k
Top of the range compact SUVs. I would pick the Kuga though because of the savings and its a damn good car.

Express · 20-12-2015, 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tempted

Honestly, that screen in the Mercedes looks like the worst afterthought ever. Looks like they just got a tablet and glued it to the top of the dash.

I have one of those in my B180 and think it looks great.

I also notice a couple of other manufacturers are starting to copy this style.

LoudPipes · 20-12-2015, 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tempted

Nah don't like it. Looks like a cheap $79 tablet from Aldi that's just been tacked on. Manufacturers are just following each other like sheep with these silly fads, I really don't see what the appeal is.
Out of all the above I think the BMW has the best looking interior.

I'm another person who thinks the Mercedes interior and screens look great and are very functional.

All manufacturers follow each other - the black rim fad was one of the biggest epic fails in my book.

Express · 21-12-2015, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tempted

From some people's attitudes it seems that you strictly aren't allowed to criticize Mercedes as they cannot put a foot wrong. We all have to get down on our knees and worship that badge.

I’m not entirely happy with the grey colour of the carpet material used on the inside of the glovebox in my C Class, in my opinion it could be greyer.

There see, I can be critical of Mercedes when it’s warranted.

new2ford · 20-12-2015, 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tempted

And another thing, somebody should tell Mercedes that round air vents belong in the 60's and 70's. They don't suit modern cars imo.

I'm glad somebody else noticed that. But I think that and the column gear shift are aimed at the USA market.

Sioso · 20-12-2015, 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by new2ford

I'm glad somebody else noticed that. But I think that and the column gear shift are aimed at the USA market.

If they used floor shift in USA markets they would have know where to put their Mega Slurpees.

LoudPipes · 20-12-2015, 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tempted

And another thing, somebody should tell Mercedes that round air vents belong in the 60's and 70's. They don't suit modern cars imo.

What 60's and 70's cars had round vents?

**GasoLane** · 20-12-2015, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tempted

That's all we need. More soccer mums in suv's clogging the roads. A badge that screams "look at me!!!"

Quote:

Originally Posted by tempted

Honestly, that screen in the Mercedes looks like the worst afterthought ever. Looks like they just got a tablet and glued it to the top of the dash.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tempted

Nah don't like it. Looks like a cheap $79 tablet from Aldi that's just been tacked on. Manufacturers are just following each other like sheep with these silly fads, I really don't see what the appeal is.
Out of all the above I think the BMW has the best looking interior.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tempted

And another thing, somebody should tell Mercedes that round air vents belong in the 60's and 70's. They don't suit modern cars imo.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tempted

Well I would have to disagree with you on that. I think the Mercedes interior looks spartan, drab and industrial. The BMW interior looks far more classy and appealing and looks like a luxury car interior should.
Mercedes have made some decent stuff in the past but I think they have really lost the plot in recent years with their styling both inside and out.
The new C class for instance is a cockroach on wheels, looks worse than an AU from some angles.
From some people's attitudes it seems that you strictly aren't allowed to criticize Mercedes as they cannot put a foot wrong. We all have to get down on our knees and worship that badge.

Y'know, considering that all of your posts here (like most of your posts on AFF) are very negative. I'd have to wonder why you bother.

**GasoLane** · 20-12-2015, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tempted

Well it's a discussion forum, people are allowed to have negative opinions.
Or would you rather we all conformed with each other like blind sheep? How boring and one sided would the discussion be then?

I realise this, but I would have thought that once you had made you thoughts known that you don't like a certain type/brand or vehicle you would leave it at that, instead of banging the same drum in every post !!

**Cav** · 19-12-2015, 04:08 PM

Yeah, but which one pulls the chicks?

malazn mafia · 19-12-2015, 04:53 PM

None. Ford territory titanium for me.

Qwerty321 · 19-12-2015, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by malazn mafia

None. Ford territory titanium for me.

This.

Tbh all those cars look pretty bad, the Range Rover is probably the best. I don't understand the logic behind those cars though. They can't really off road, might as well get a sedan or a station wagon.

new2ford · 19-12-2015, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwerty321

This.

Tbh all those cars look pretty bad, the Range Rover is probably the best. I don't understand the logic behind those cars though. They can't really off road, might as well get a sedan or a station wagon.

Having stepped from a Territory Ghia into one of these, sorry, but there is a definite edge - and so there should be, you pay more for it! Territory is pretty good though.

Including the Audi, all of these models are good enough that any difference boils down to different tastes among buyers. The BMW is however the driver's car, the Range Rover a little bit of off road cred - though you wouldn't buy any of this class for off road work. That's not their purpose, they're high step-in family road cars, like the Territory.

xrystl · 19-12-2015, 05:05 PM

Not having the Audi Q5 in this list seems strange as it seems to be the same size as those tested and has a very good reputation.

FPV+fteT3 · 19-12-2015, 05:34 PM

Considering an Evoque for my next daily 2.2TD should be a nice driver.

sprintman1 · 20-12-2015, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPV+fteT3

Considering an Evoque for my next daily 2.2TD should be a nice driver.

If you're a hairdresser yes...

FPV+fteT3 · 20-12-2015, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sprintman1

If you're a hairdresser yes...

No not a hairdresser but do @40k per year in my FPV and the 6L/100km 4 doors awd is probably much more usable than my 13L/100km ute but any way it won't be your problem because judging from your sprintman1 your still stuck in the 90's and thats cool because thats not my problem either.

Mark^^ · 19-12-2015, 05:47 PM

I have been driving my Evoque for 2 years it fantastic to drive. One of my staff drive a GLC and its no good off road at all.

Sioso · 19-12-2015, 06:32 PM

Macan Turbo (actually any of them S, GTS, or Turbo).
Beats all of them for speed, handling, luxury and build quality.
Comes at a price though.

b0son · 19-12-2015, 07:36 PM

I'd have thought a Discovery Sport would make this group ... it seems small enough.

Bearman · 19-12-2015, 08:00 PM

I like the look of the Merc. I'd happily own the Landy and the Beemer but damn, that Lexus is UGLY!!!!!!!!!

arronm · 20-12-2015, 02:15 AM

Drove an AMG ML63 great car

Brazen · 20-12-2015, 07:49 AM

I like the floating tablet screen, because if they were to raise the dash to keep the screen in your line of sight, the dash starts looking like a block of flats.

Sabantien · 20-12-2015, 12:17 PM

I don't get SUVs. I'd much rather a sedan for on the road, or a proper 4wd to go off road.

The bonus of an SUV is you sit higher, which you really only need to do because every other bastard out there is driving a SUV.

Admittedly the older I get, the more my back wouldn't mind stepping into a car rather than sitting down into one... but still.

Definitely like the look of the Range Rover inside and out of those cars, but would prefer a Discovery if I was doing that.