Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-06-2006, 09:07 AM   #1
OldManGhia
Regular Member
 
OldManGhia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Coffs Harbour
Posts: 188
Default NSW Fines - Infringement Processing Bureau

It seems from news reports this morning that NSW motorists who have been fined since 2001 may get their fines refunded because the Infringement Processing Bureau was apparently not given the power to issue fines. The case will end up in the Supreme Court before it is finally decided. The State Debt Recovery Office has taken over the task that The Infringement Processing Bureau had due to the problem related to the pending court case.

Its my bet that NSW Motorists wont see a cent of any fines they have copped since 2001. Can always hope I suppose.

OldManGhia is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-06-2006, 10:33 AM   #2
jmc-007
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 388
Default

I hope this is true. Do i get my pts back and 165 dollars or do i have to take the pricks to court.
jmc-007 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-06-2006, 10:34 AM   #3
Keepleft
Mot Adv-NSW
 
Keepleft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lake Macquarie, NSW
Posts: 2,153
Default

Quite please.

The issue will quite likely go to the High Court.

The argument is that is that due process was not followed.


Quote:
JMC-007 wrote: I hope this is true. Do i get my pts back and 165 dollars or do i have to take the pricks to court.
THAT will remain to be seen. You cannot take to one court something that is yet to be determined by another. IF NSW Gov Co lose this, you then need to await their governmental response.

Understand that all governments project revenue from this stream.
__________________
ORDER FORD AUSTRALIA PART NO: AM6U7J19G329AA. This is a European-UN/AS3790B Spec safety-warning triangle used to give advanced warning to approaching traffic of a vehicle breakdown, or crash scene (to prevent secondary). Stow in the boot area. See your Ford dealer for this $35.95 safety item & when you buy a new Ford, please insist on it! See Page 83, part 4.4.1 http://www.transport.wa.gov.au/media...eSafePart4.pdf
Keepleft is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-06-2006, 09:15 PM   #4
MO
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: QLD
Posts: 4,446
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keepleft
Quite please.
QUIET...sorry sport but it was just to obvious.
__________________
FORD RULES OK

The more I know ppl the more I love my DOGS.
2011 SY Territory Limited Edition TS
2000 AUII SE ute IL6
MO is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-06-2006, 10:14 PM   #5
Sorted
OzEcruisers PRESIDENT
 
Sorted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbz
Posts: 15,761
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: For all the contributions you make to the AFF community. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John McMaster
QUIET...sorry sport but it was just to obvious.
Bugger Keepleft re-edited it so it looked like he could spell

Sorry had to state the obvious, lol.
__________________
1994 Ford Fairmont EF NA 6cyl Man 3.9 diff Sedan
PROEF 13.46 @ 105.78mph

Tuned by DYNOMOTIVE

200BUX - AFF Drag Nats 2019 EF Wagon
Quote:
Originally Posted by rednose View Post
Common knowledge that the more weight you take out of the car the less power you need to run the time.
Sorted is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-06-2006, 05:51 PM   #6
deesun
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
deesun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John McMaster
QUIET...sorry sport but it was just to obvious.
Or could it be too obvious. :togo:
__________________
igodabigblackshinycar and I relented and allowed a BMW into the garage.
deesun is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-06-2006, 01:57 PM   #7
PH47
Ford Power, in a Merc?
 
PH47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Leura, Blue Mountains
Posts: 664
Default

Pfft doesn't matter WHAT the courts decide, the government will bring in some law or rule or exception that means we won't see a cent.
PH47 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-06-2006, 07:22 PM   #8
devil cv8
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PH47
Pfft doesn't matter WHAT the courts decide, the government will bring in some law or rule or exception that means we won't see a cent.
the term is retrospective legislation.....
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-06-2006, 05:21 PM   #9
DJM83
Barra Turbo > V8
Donating Member3
 
DJM83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26,198
Default

well if it all goes ahead ill be 1500 bucks in pocket but i doubt it though
__________________
-2011 XR6 Turbo Ute - Lux Pack - M6
-2022 Hyundai Tucson Highlander Diesel N Line
DJM83 is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-06-2006, 05:57 PM   #10
4.9 EF Futura
Official AFF conservative
 
4.9 EF Futura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 3,549
Default

Lol - administrative law... my favourite subject.

Yeah im not sure how things work at a state level but in federal matters in my line of work, the Act specifies who can and cannot issue infringements etc. However, said person can make a formal delegation (in the way of a legislative instrument) to delegate certain authorities down the line.

Certainly worth keeping an eye on this one... in NSW.
__________________
A cup half empty... but full of euphoria.
4.9 EF Futura is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-06-2006, 06:01 PM   #11
Walkinshaw
Two > One
 
Walkinshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 7,063
Default

no one will see a cent back. EVER. Gaurentee it
__________________
1978 LTD - 408ci - 11.5@120.6mph -
2004 S4 - 4.2 - M6 - quattro -

Walkinshaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-06-2006, 06:12 PM   #12
4.9 EF Futura
Official AFF conservative
 
4.9 EF Futura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 3,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walkinshaw
no one will see a cent back. EVER. Gaurentee it
I wouldnt expect them to. If they got done speeding - they got done speeding. The agency who extracted the monetary fine out of the NSW motorists has little to do with the infringement itself!

The procedure of the current course of action would be administrative i imagine, has probably been to the ADJR and is being referred to high court single judge (which would most likley go to the full bench on appeal??). Im not sure if there's a seperate chain of command for state based matters...

For motorists to get their hard earned back would require some sort of class action to be taken....

One thing's for sure - senior counsel will do well out of it
__________________
A cup half empty... but full of euphoria.
4.9 EF Futura is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 03:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL