|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
| View Poll Results: Ford's Corporate P.R. Session - Impressive ? | |||
| Yes, pleased they made the effort to update us |
   
|
41 | 32.80% |
| No - They should have made more effort to clearly map out the future of Falcon, FPV and Territory |
  
|
47 | 37.60% |
| Corporate P.R. is just that and I'm undecided and will wait to see these vehicles in the metal |
  
|
37 | 29.60% |
| Voters: 125. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
16-08-2013, 06:35 PM
|
#14 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,451
|
There could be another reason for a NA Falcon. Given we are hearing the next Mustang is a normally aspirated engine. If the supercharged Falcons continued right up to Mustang, then we could have had a situation where the local media are saying we get a Mustang, but one less powerful then Falcon. If Mustang comes earlier, then we have a situation where a more powerful Falcon sits next to Mustang in the showroom.
Wouldn't have looked good for Mustangs launch either way. |
||
|
|
Re: Ford Exec's refuse to confirm Falcon production right through to Oct 2016
Threaded Mode