Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-07-2007, 11:09 PM   #331
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RIPGMH
I would rather FoA shut up shop and go out with a bang then become the white goods producing limp wrists most car companies are these days.
Why dont we just import the mondeo, its a better car than most V6 Falcons will ever be. Drop the 6 all together, get the mondeo in and leave all Falcons to be V8's. Where does it stop is the question.
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:10 PM   #332
RIPGMH
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
RIPGMH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: QLD
Posts: 1,051
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkside
boy their are alot of opinions here ,all i got to say is that their are a few of my friends that have 6bangers ba/f's and they are ****ed : that i get better economy from my gt ,and its not even close on a trip ,we live for the future ...bring it on .....doc
If that was the case wouldn't there be a shiteload of V8 falcon taxis running around??
RIPGMH is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:10 PM   #333
VeloXR6
JesusDrivesAFord
 
VeloXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkside
boy their are alot of opinions here ,all i got to say is that their are a few of my friends that have 6bangers ba/f's and they are ****ed : that i get better economy from my gt ,and its not even close on a trip ,we live for the future ...bring it on .....doc
Some of us love our 6bangers as much as you like your bent-8s...

but ford was alwyas better at 6 than holden ...now there is going to be f-all in it...
__________________
:
VeloXR6 is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:11 PM   #334
Van D
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Van D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Calgary, AB. Canada
Posts: 1,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RIPGMH
If you want economy buy a camry, I don't think I've talked to anyone that bought a falcon for its "economy"
Everyone IS buying a Camry. The the reason no-one buying a falcon is thinking of economy is the reason Ford is going under.

Hence my point, if you want Ford around in the future you better be glad they're making changes.
Van D is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:12 PM   #335
RIPGMH
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
RIPGMH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: QLD
Posts: 1,051
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polyal
Why dont we just import the mondeo, its a better car than most V6 Falcons will ever be. Drop the 6 all together, get the mondeo in and leave all Falcons to be V8's. Where does it stop is the question.
I'll tell you where it stops, with why does the Australian public even need a V8? These V6's produce plenty of power and torque, I think we can do without an 8 cylinder model.
RIPGMH is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:13 PM   #336
asusdragon
BA Falcon XT
 
asusdragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 848
Default

lets not let ford do that again
__________________
Click here to check out my signature
http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/f...ignature-1.jpg

Quote:
If you can't fix it with a hammer. you're got an electrical problem
Quote:
You only need two tools in life - WD40 and Duct Tape. If it doesn't move and should, use the WD40, If it shouldnt move and does, use the duct tape
asusdragon is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:13 PM   #337
Van D
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Van D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Calgary, AB. Canada
Posts: 1,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RIPGMH
I would rather FoA shut up shop and go out with a bang then become the white goods producing limp wrists most car companies are these days.
And you don't think this new engine could produce a nice bang? Fair enough it's a sad day, but no-one was complaining when they were driving US wheezers and clevo's around. In fact many people on these boards import their V8 parts from the US anyway, why can't it happen with the 6?

Besides, no-one complains about using foreign ZF's and what not either. It's just a hunk of metal under the hood. If we really wanted the I6 to stay, people shouldn't of being complaining about it 15 years ago and flocking to V8's, and it should have being far further developed far earlier like other 6's around the world.

It might be the best 6 Aus has, but that doesn't mean there's better across the ocean.
Van D is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:14 PM   #338
Perana
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Perana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Australia
Posts: 3,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeloXR6
Some of us love our 6bangers as much as you like your bent-8s...

but ford was alwyas better at 6 than holden ...now there is going to be f-all in it...
Of course all V6's are identical! Just being inline instantly makes an engine 10000000 times better.. The old 202 Holden wasn't much of a motor.. but guess what that was an I6.

Go drive a Duratec (preferably a 35 or 37 but even a 3L would do but remember that our version has MANY improvements like VCT and extra capacity) then drive an Alloytec.. THEN come back and say there is f all in it

This place is full of damn keyboard warriors
Perana is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:17 PM   #339
Van D
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Van D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Calgary, AB. Canada
Posts: 1,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perana XR8
Of course all V6's are identical! Just being inline instantly makes an engine 10000000 times better.. The old 202 Holden wasn't much of a motor.. but guess what that was an I6.

Go drive a Duratec (preferably a 35 or 37 but even a 3L would do) then drive an Alloytec.. THEN come back and say there is f all in it

This place is full of damn keyboard warriors
Agreed.
Van D is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:18 PM   #340
VeloXR6
JesusDrivesAFord
 
VeloXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor
If the main engine isn't an inline 6 the 2010 Aussie Ford just shouldn't be called a Falcon as far as I'm concerned, its time for a new name.

Let the Falcon nameplate go to that big scrapyard in the sky and join other icons like the Kingswood and Valiant.
I must agree ... the falcon must die with the I6
__________________
:
VeloXR6 is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:19 PM   #341
VeloXR6
JesusDrivesAFord
 
VeloXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perana XR8

This place is full of damn keyboard warriors
Like You
__________________
:
VeloXR6 is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:20 PM   #342
RIPGMH
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
RIPGMH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: QLD
Posts: 1,051
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perana XR8
Of course all V6's are identical! Just being inline instantly makes an engine 10000000 times better.. The old 202 Holden wasn't much of a motor.. but guess what that was an I6.

Go drive a Duratec (preferably a 35 or 37 but even a 3L would do but remember that our version has MANY improvements like VCT and extra capacity) then drive an Alloytec.. THEN come back and say there is f all in it

This place is full of damn keyboard warriors
Porsche also happen to believe in six cylinders in a straight line while your bagging the configuration. And for its day the red 202 is a far better motor than a poxy Alloytec.
RIPGMH is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:20 PM   #343
Perana
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Perana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Australia
Posts: 3,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeloXR6
Like You
Huh? Seeing i have actually DRIVEN cars containing some of these engines I can hardly see how you think that.
Perana is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:22 PM   #344
VeloXR6
JesusDrivesAFord
 
VeloXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perana XR8
Of course all V6's are identical! Just being inline instantly makes an engine 10000000 times better.. The old 202 Holden wasn't much of a motor.. but guess what that was an I6.

Go drive a Duratec (preferably a 35 or 37 but even a 3L would do but remember that our version has MANY improvements like VCT and extra capacity) then drive an Alloytec.. THEN come back and say there is f all in it

This place is full of damn keyboard warriors
So please what car do you own ????

Is it a BA XR8 ... if so or an earlier model , WTF do you care about the I6 ??


I care because I own one and 6 different models previous ,,, can you say that ????

please leave these threads to those who care and know WTF they are talking about.
__________________
:
VeloXR6 is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:23 PM   #345
Iphido
Guy that posts stuff
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 553
Default

Very disapointed with this news for several reasons:
- The I6 made the falcon very unique in a market completely dominated by some very ordinary V6's
- The I6 had clear advantage in capacity in this market
- This resulted in a very relaxed and torquey engine that suited the Australian market
- The I6 was always at the pointy end of the field when it came to performance beating other 6's and most 8's (inc from its own house). The Turbo is proberly the best affordable RWD car engine ford has. It proberly single handedly kept the falcon selling through the tough times.

Australians are very synical about engines changes. I bet you could ask half a dozen car enthusists and most would still say the nissan engined ones were the best sixes ever to wear a holden badge. How much crap did the LS1 cop when it appeared. How about the HFV6, it gets bagged a lot. These engines have over 20kw power improvements over earlier models. Things are going to get worse before they get better.

Sorry Ford, the I6 is such a significant part of the falcon. Looking at recent decisions with Orion and now the loss of the I6, I think I will be saying bye bye to Ford.

Problems with the V6:
- Designed for smaller cars in europe and the US. Heavily motivated by huge FWD car sales, any RWD application will be a secondary concideration.
- Lower capacity (see above)
- Higher RPM for power and torque (see above)
- Hence less relaxed crusing
- Less unique engine character
- More cost and complication for turbo varient
- Additional cost and complication with DI varients
- Less proven capabilities in the harsh Australian enviroment and driving styles

Given Ford is struggling in the V8 market (soon to be abandoned again!?), I can't imagine a move to a smaller, less unique V6 is going to be a positive one.

For this to be a positive move, we would be talking about atleast a 4.0 or greater capacity 60 degree V6 with a nearly square bore:stroke ratio. Made out of aluminium with high alloy component ratio. Power would have to be atleast 20kw above previous levels (atleast 210kw) and torque to be no less than ~95% of current levels. On top of this a turbo varient with 600Nm of torque and over 300kw of power from the factory with potential for more than this.. I doubt we will see a falcon six ever again with the potential of the current Turbo.

I don't see this happening. Penny wise, pound foolish. What they will lose is something that cannot be replaced by marketing $'s and the slight advantage in packaging.

Lets see what getting chopped:
-Fairlane and LTD, Chopped
-Inline six (inc turbo) chopped
-5.4 L V8 SOHC chopped
-Wagon chopped
-Question marks over regular V8 lineup, atleast remaining competitive with other V8's (hemi and Commodore)
-Extensive orion make over, watered down? (come on, the changes are pretty superfical really)

What we see here is the problems in the US operations impacting on Australian product design.

My prediction in 5 years:
-No hot six
-Only 1 model in the ford lineup with a V8
-Manual transmission to be discontinued
Iphido is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:23 PM   #346
rodderz
.
 
rodderz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bundoora
Posts: 7,199
Default

Probably one of the fastest growing threads we've had here, and it's a good one too, BUT

Maybe we should all cool off and settle for a bit while we think of what the new donk may be like instead of degenerating it into a slanging match and focusing on D-Day. Not to say you're not entitled to opinions but to look at it from both sides would be greatly beneficial
rodderz is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:25 PM   #347
VeloXR6
JesusDrivesAFord
 
VeloXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iphido
Very disapointed with this news for several reasons:
- The I6 made the falcon very unique in a market completely dominated by some very ordinary V6's
- The I6 had clear advantage in capacity in this market
- This resulted in a very relaxed and torquey engine that suited the Australian market
- The I6 was always at the pointy end of the field when it came to performance beating other 6's and most 8's (inc from its own house). The Turbo is proberly the best affordable RWD car engine ford has. It proberly single handedly kept the falcon selling through the tough times.

Australians are very synical about engines changes. I bet you could ask half a dozen car enthusists and most would still say the nissan engined ones were the best sixes ever to wear a holden badge. How much crap did the LS1 cop when it appeared. How about the HFV6, it gets bagged a lot. These engines have over 20kw power improvements over earlier models. Things are going to get worse before they get better.

Sorry Ford, the I6 is such a significant part of the falcon. Looking at recent decisions with Orion and now the loss of the I6, I think I will be saying bye bye to Ford.

Problems with the V6:
- Designed for smaller cars in europe and the US. Heavily motivated by huge FWD car sales, any RWD application will be a secondary concideration.
- Lower capacity (see above)
- Higher RPM for power and torque (see above)
- Hence less relaxed crusing
- Less unique engine character
- More cost and complication for turbo varient
- Additional cost and complication with DI varients
- Less proven capabilities in the harsh Australian enviroment and driving styles

Given Ford is struggling in the V8 market (soon to be abandoned again!?), I can't imagine a move to a smaller, less unique V6 is going to be a positive one.

For this to be a positive move, we would be talking about atleast a 4.0 or greater capacity 60 degree V6 with a nearly square bore:stroke ratio. Made out of aluminium with high alloy component ratio. Power would have to be atleast 20kw above previous levels (atleast 210kw) and torque to be no less than ~95% of current levels. On top of this a turbo varient with 600Nm of torque and over 300kw of power from the factory with potential for more than this.. I doubt we will see a falcon six ever again with the potential of the current Turbo.

I don't see this happening. Penny wise, pound foolish. What they will lose is something that cannot be replaced by marketing $'s and the slight advantage in packaging.

Lets see what getting chopped:
-Fairlane and LTD, Chopped
-Inline six (inc turbo) chopped
-5.4 L V8 SOHC chopped
-Wagon chopped
-Question marks over regular V8 lineup, atleast remaining competitive with other V8's (hemi and Commodore)
-Extensive orion make over, watered down? (come on, the changes are pretty superfical really)

What we see here is the problems in the US operations impacting on Australian product design.

My prediction in 5 years:
-No hot six
-Only 1 model in the ford lineup with a V8
-Manual transmission to be discontinued
Yep....
__________________
:
VeloXR6 is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:25 PM   #348
Perana
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Perana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Australia
Posts: 3,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RIPGMH
Porsche also happen to believe in six cylinders in a straight line while your bagging the configuration. And for its day the red 202 is a far better motor than a poxy Alloytec.
Where is Porsche's I6.. I dont recall them having any engine with 6 cylinders in a row apart from their race Flat 12's....

Im NOT arguing that V6 is better than I6 on paper in fact i agree that I6 has better dynamics ON PAPER.. I'm arguing that there is nothing wrong with a Duratec engined Falcon that WILL be smoother and more efficient than the old engine despite the V6 being at a dynamic balance disadvantage. IMO the BEST case for FoA would have been an all new I6.. but for our market that would never ever happen.

The difference to what ON PAPER is better and what actually is better is vastly different in the real world..
Perana is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:26 PM   #349
Van D
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Van D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Calgary, AB. Canada
Posts: 1,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RIPGMH
Porsche also happen to believe in six cylinders in a straight line while your bagging the configuration. And for its day the red 202 is a far better motor than a poxy Alloytec.
Mate, i'm sure Porsche has a lot more money than Ford and can afford to run it's I6 program, Ford can't.
Van D is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:26 PM   #350
asusdragon
BA Falcon XT
 
asusdragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RIPGMH
Porsche also happen to believe in six cylinders in a straight line while your bagging the configuration. And for its day the red 202 is a far better motor than a poxy Alloytec.
i got a six boat witha red 202 in it and it does pull pretty well and other then the different manifold for boat use the motor is pretty much untouch and well i cant complain bout it and for boat use its pretty much either inline 6 or v8 for the low torque you need
__________________
Click here to check out my signature
http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/f...ignature-1.jpg

Quote:
If you can't fix it with a hammer. you're got an electrical problem
Quote:
You only need two tools in life - WD40 and Duct Tape. If it doesn't move and should, use the WD40, If it shouldnt move and does, use the duct tape
asusdragon is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:33 PM   #351
Perana
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Perana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Australia
Posts: 3,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeloXR6
So please what car do you own ????

Is it a BA XR8 ... if so or an earlier model , WTF do you care about the I6 ??


I care because I own one and 6 different models previous ,,, can you say that ????

please leave these threads to those who care and know WTF they are talking about.
No its not even a V8.. FYI My main car is an AU6 engined EA, My Partner owns an I6 ED, Parents own an AU XR6 (which i have done a LOT of miles in), Also own an XE 6cyl. I have also had a fair bit of experience in driving BA I6's sure they are nice engines but their time is up. I care because I look forward to still being able to buy a new falcon in 10 years time.

Why don't I know WTF I am talking about... You obviously have no idea how business works if you can seriously think that it doesn't make Business sense to pour the money from the I6 program into a Global V6, that WILL be more efficient and a better choice.
Perana is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:33 PM   #352
Van D
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Van D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Calgary, AB. Canada
Posts: 1,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iphido
Very disapointed with this news for several reasons:
- The I6 made the falcon very unique in a market completely dominated by some very ordinary V6's True
- The I6 had clear advantage in capacity in this market Understandable
- This resulted in a very relaxed and torquey engine that suited the Australian market Judging by current sales, completely False
- The I6 was always at the pointy end of the field when it came to performance beating other 6's and most 8's (inc from its own house). The Turbo is proberly the best affordable RWD car engine ford has. It proberly single handedly kept the falcon selling through the tough times. The new 6 perhaps, but the pre BA 6 was nothing to get excited about. Look around at 6cyl competitions and see how many 265 Hemi's still end up on top

Australians are very synical about engines changes. I bet you could ask half a dozen car enthusists and most would still say the nissan engined ones were the best sixes ever to wear a holden badge. How much crap did the LS1 cop when it appeared. How about the HFV6, it gets bagged a lot. These engines have over 20kw power improvements over earlier models. Things are going to get worse before they get better. Things may be worse before better but it's better than just being worse.

Sorry Ford, the I6 is such a significant part of the falcon. Looking at recent decisions with Orion and now the loss of the I6, I think I will be saying bye bye to Ford.

Problems with the V6:
- Designed for smaller cars in europe and the US. Heavily motivated by huge FWD car sales, any RWD application will be a secondary concideration. Have you driven the cars these engines are in, or even know what cars the 35 is in?
- Lower capacity (see above) Still produces more power
- Higher RPM for power and torque (see above) True, but it's early in development
- Hence less relaxed crusing Have you driven one?
- Less unique engine character 99% of people couldn't care less
- More cost and complication for turbo varient Is this proven on this engine? If so, please show me
- Additional cost and complication with DI varients How do you know this already?
- Less proven capabilities in the harsh Australian enviroment and driving styles The engine isn't even being used over here yet, how do you know?

Given Ford is struggling in the V8 market (soon to be abandoned again!?), I can't imagine a move to a smaller, less unique V6 is going to be a positive one. I can, it's more economical.

For this to be a positive move, we would be talking about atleast a 4.0 or greater capacity 60 degree V6 with a nearly square bore:stroke ratio. Made out of aluminium with high alloy component ratio. Power would have to be atleast 20kw above previous levels (atleast 210kw) and torque to be no less than ~95% of current levels. On top of this a turbo varient with 600Nm of torque and over 300kw of power from the factory with potential for more than this.. I doubt we will see a falcon six ever again with the potential of the current Turbo. The 35 already has these power figures basically

I don't see this happening. Penny wise, pound foolish. What they will lose is something that cannot be replaced by marketing $'s and the slight advantage in packaging.

Lets see what getting chopped:
-Fairlane and LTD, Chopped
-Inline six (inc turbo) chopped
-5.4 L V8 SOHC chopped
-Wagon chopped
-Question marks over regular V8 lineup, atleast remaining competitive with other V8's (hemi and Commodore)
-Extensive orion make over, watered down? (come on, the changes are pretty superfical really)

What we see here is the problems in the US operations impacting on Australian product design. Of course, it's a global company.
Bold points.
Van D is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:35 PM   #353
Van D
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Van D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Calgary, AB. Canada
Posts: 1,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeloXR6
So please what car do you own ????

Is it a BA XR8 ... if so or an earlier model , WTF do you care about the I6 ??


I care because I own one and 6 different models previous ,,, can you say that ????

please leave these threads to those who care and know WTF they are talking about.
And for the record, I love my inline 6's. I'm only 19 but i've owned 3 different falc's with a 250. The family has also owned (at least since I was born), an XD, XE, EA, ED, EL and BA. All in I6 variants. Like I said, i'm sad to see it go, but i'd be even sadder to see Ford go.
Van D is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:44 PM   #354
VeloXR6
JesusDrivesAFord
 
VeloXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perana XR8
No its not even a V8.. FYI My main car is an AU6 engined EA, My Partner owns an I6 ED, Parents own an AU XR6 (which i have done a LOT of miles in), Also own an XE 6cyl. I have also had a fair bit of experience in driving BA I6's sure they are nice engines but their time is up. I care because I look forward to still being able to buy a new falcon in 10 years time.

Why don't I know WTF I am talking about... You obviously have no idea how business works if you can seriously think that it doesn't make Business sense to pour the money from the I6 program into a Global V6, that WILL be more efficient and a better choice.
Look, no disrespect to you,

I have owned BA's , Au's EL, EF, EB, EA, XF, XD, XB etc etc....

I am only 33 Yo but Ihave had alot of falcons and Am extreemly passionate about my I6 ... I love them and will miss them...

Fortunately I can afford what I wnt these days and am saddened by the demise of my favorite engine, something that I think set ford apart from holden in a very big way...
__________________
:
VeloXR6 is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:46 PM   #355
RPO83
ĕm-bär'gō? 2016
 
RPO83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 680
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathXR
So much misinformation in this thread, it's horrible.

Ford WILL NOT just retrench 600 when production stops in 2010. Put your brains into gear people.

In 3 years, people will retire - not just some of the 600, people in areas like the stamping plant which isn't closing. Ford also TRAIN people, if you've ever done a tour of the Geelong plant and heard the tour guides talk, they will explain people get opportunities to get training, not just when jobs are moving on, but any time. What do you think the people who were replaced by robots in the stamping plant did? They retired, or got other jobs either within or outside Ford.

You've also read articles about the $$ investment in Product Development in Geelong. Who knows what other jobs that could potentially create?

When Mitsu closed their engine plant, they just closed it. Ford has given advanced warning, and I'm sure all of those workers won't be treated poorly at all.

V6 or I6, it stays a Falcon. Commodore didn't change names for an engine config change, nor should Falcon.

It is definitely a sound business decision, even if it upsets a few enthusiasts. The average Joe doesn't even know the difference between V6 and I6, and some of the motoring reporters who covered the initial murmerings of this announcement didn't seem to know either!

Who knows, maybe my next locally built Ford will be a Duratorq (not Duratec) powered vehicle - I can hope anyway. All this talk about torque and the diesels have it in spades.
Imagine coming home to read this thead and forgetting to bring your power pack home for your laptop. All I can say is i'm glad I bought the 7hr battery with this machine!

Another great post that I had to quote purely because it makes the most sense here. Why can't Ford Communications get something out that puts emphasis on the reasoning behind what they are doing and how it is better so the crazed I6er's can absorb something first before dishing out some truely baseless garbage. A big day for Ford to communicate a clear message...what was McAlary doing today???
RPO83 is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:49 PM   #356
VeloXR6
JesusDrivesAFord
 
VeloXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RPO83
Imagine coming home to read this thead and forgetting to bring your power pack home for your laptop. All I can say is i'm glad I bought the 7hr battery with this machine!

Another great post that I had to quote purely because it makes the most sense here. Why can't Ford Communications get something out that puts emphasis on the reasoning behind what they are doing and how it is better so the crazed I6er's can absorb something first before dishing out some truely baseless garbage. A big day for Ford to communicate a clear message...what was McAlary doing today???
Imagine being the poor astard from ford told to " Release a nice statement that will keep the fans happy"

Unfortunately I have worked for large corporate and know how much the top tier cares.... F - All...
__________________
:
VeloXR6 is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:49 PM   #357
Perana
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Perana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Australia
Posts: 3,173
Default

Don't get me wrong I am saddened by this as well. But I have an open mind to new engines and I will reserve my absolute final judgement about the new engine when it's over here.. Will definitely be having a drive of the CX9 when that comes out. But from my inital impressions of the 3.0L Duratec I think it's going to go quite well in the Falcon once it is 3.7L and with VCT, DI etc. the Twin Turbo version in development looks quite nice too...

I don't think losing the I6 is the end of the world. For me it would be much worse if I wasn't able to buy a Falcon at all.. I'll gladly take a V6 RWD Falcon over none at all. My main concern is for the workers, especially since I personally know a couple of them, I am at least glad ford seems to be attempting to do right by them.
Perana is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:51 PM   #358
rodderz
.
 
rodderz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bundoora
Posts: 7,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RPO83
Why can't Ford Communications get something out that puts emphasis on the reasoning behind what they are doing and how it is better so the crazed I6er's can absorb something first before dishing out some truely baseless garbage. A big day for Ford to communicate a clear message...what was McAlary doing today???
Have to agree, whether the media havent mentioned everything (unless there is a transcript of the Ford release?) or not the reasons behind the whole decision could of been explained and eased up the minds of worried people. Unless there is news that they cant release due to being part of future company plans and models
rodderz is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:53 PM   #359
VeloXR6
JesusDrivesAFord
 
VeloXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perana XR8
Don't get me wrong I am saddened by this as well. But I have an open mind to new engines and I will reserve my absolute final judgement about the new engine when it's over here.. Will definitely be having a drive of the CX9 when that comes out. But from my inital impressions of the 3.0L Duratec I think it's going to go quite well in the Falcon once it is 3.7L and with VCT, DI etc. the Twin Turbo version in development looks quite nice too...

I don't think losing the I6 is the end of the world. For me it would be much worse if I wasn't able to buy a Falcon at all.. I'll gladly take a V6 RWD Falcon over none at all. My main concern is for the workers, especially since I personally know a couple of them, I am at least glad ford seems to be attempting to do right by them.
That sets me apart from you....

to me it is the end of the world ... and the end of my financial relationship with ford....
__________________
:
VeloXR6 is offline  
Old 18-07-2007, 11:53 PM   #360
Perana
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Perana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Australia
Posts: 3,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodderz
Have to agree, whether the media havent mentioned everything (unless there is a transcript of the Ford release?) or not the reasons behind the whole decision could of been explained and eased up the minds of worried people. Unless there is news that they cant release due to being part of future company plans and models
Yes I agree as well. I don't think the release was handled that well. Ch10 News are reporting that FoA are "axing" 600 jobs, when that is clearly not the case when you take into account retraining etc. Typical Media i guess..

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeloXR6
That sets me apart from you....

to me it is the end of the world ... and the end of my financial relationship with ford....
And that is your choice.. but no offense to you but you are in the minority in the buying public. Most people do not know what the difference between an I6 and a V6 is, in fact of those that know a small amount most will think that a V6 is superior because that's what everyone uses. It is only enthusiasts who really know much about what actually drives our cars and what the on-paper advantages of certain configurations are over others.
Perana is offline  
Closed Thread


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL