Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26-02-2009, 10:31 AM   #31
TZENU
XY Driv3r
 
TZENU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,004
Default

A Factory 8.4 second car.....
__________________
Genuine Faker NOW BROKEN
Imagniation is a human element creativity is the result
TZENU is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2009, 10:59 AM   #32
colossus
Secret Sleuth
 
colossus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 306
Default

I can believe the quarter mile time but i'm not buying the 0-100 in 1.5secs...seems physically impossible in a car of that weight power (traction?). To put this in perspective a 1000cc sports bike does 0-100 anywhere from 2-3 seconds depending on rider. Seems absurd a big fat car could beat this. Prove me wrong Bugatti.
__________________
BF Mk2.5 XR6 Turbo
colossus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2009, 11:08 AM   #33
XR06T
13.96 @ 101.65
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rockingham WA
Posts: 1,577
Default

no road tyre in the world is getting a 2 tonne car to 100kph in 1.5 seconds.

no chance it will get into the 8's. high 9's MAYBE.

beautiful car but, as if they weren't exclusive enough!!
__________________
BLUEPRINT XR6T
XR8 CAI - K&N Filter - T56 - Generic Tune
XR06T is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2009, 11:16 AM   #34
Cobra
Bear with a sore head
 
Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR06T
no road tyre in the world is getting a 2 tonne car to 100kph in 1.5 seconds.

no chance it will get into the 8's. high 9's MAYBE.

beautiful car but, as if they weren't exclusive enough!!
They already do high 9's. My guess is low 2's 0-100km/h and mid 9's down the quarter. Depending on the gearing, they may sacrifice performance down low to get more top speed. I don't think Bugatti would have been happy that an american car took their title as the worlds fastest car, and this may be just an excuse to reclaim that title.
Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2009, 11:27 AM   #35
JD86
DELANY
 
JD86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,733
Default

Unbelievable, but those times are hard to comprehend, just have to wait and see one in action
__________________
2010 FG XR6T - 6 speed manual - luxury pack
JD86 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2009, 12:00 PM   #36
ImpGonads
Fart Poweredâ„¢
 
ImpGonads's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 869
Default

They probably will make faster and faster cars, however there has to be a limit to what the human body can withstand..? I would love to take one of these around the track, like Ricky Bobby "I just wanna go fast!"
__________________
"Ye tho I walk through the valley of rice... I fear no turbo...for torque are with me."
ImpGonads is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2009, 05:43 PM   #37
Piotr
Non-Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,040
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by colossus
I can believe the quarter mile time but i'm not buying the 0-100 in 1.5secs...seems physically impossible in a car of that weight power (traction?). To put this in perspective a 1000cc sports bike does 0-100 anywhere from 2-3 seconds depending on rider. Seems absurd a big fat car could beat this. Prove me wrong Bugatti.
Weight increases traction
__________________
2005 Renault Sport Megane 225
Piotr is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2009, 06:01 PM   #38
Jondalar
Formely FG G6E Turbo
 
Jondalar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,694
Default

Topgear claimed each original Veyron cost about twice as much to make as they sold for, wonder what the ratio would be for that beastie?
__________________
Formerly G6E Turbo, BF XR8
Jondalar is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2009, 06:22 PM   #39
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

The top end of town will weather this economic chrisis we are seeing now. There is a market for the mega cars, now and in the future.

Good on them for building such an outrageous vehicle. If it can be called that. Hell, it will be more powerful and faster than MOST dedicated race cars...! Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the 'average' F1 car do 1-100 in low to mid 2's, and the 1/4 in high 9's low 10's....? Oh, and top out at under 400.....

Love the look, love the exclusivity, and love the concept.

Outrageous, unshackled, politically incorrect excess at it's best!
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2009, 06:24 PM   #40
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImpGonads
They probably will make faster and faster cars, however there has to be a limit to what the human body can withstand..? I would love to take one of these around the track, like Ricky Bobby "I just wanna go fast!"

Me thinks a fighter pilot is a tad closer to the 'threshold' than the fat bloke with 2 mil to drop on a mega car ever will be...?
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2009, 07:39 PM   #41
DJM83
Barra Turbo > V8
Donating Member3
 
DJM83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TUF_302
Cant wait for Clarkson to get his hands on one of these baby's!!!
: i can see it now PPOOWWAAHH : , that thing is a serious weapon but still not sold on its looks
__________________
-2011 XR6 Turbo Ute - Lux Pack - M6
-2022 Hyundai Tucson Highlander Diesel N Line
DJM83 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2009, 07:59 PM   #42
Rev28K
re
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Victoria - where being slow & incompetent is considered being "safe"
Posts: 1,323
Default

I did a rough calculation based on the old simplistic "it takes 4 times the power to go twice as fast" statement. And based on that it looks as if the new car should be able to do the new claimed top speed with that mega motor.
__________________
Scuderia Rev: Otto the tow pig - 2007 3.0 litre Coupé, vernünftig schnelle aber kein peilstab, Bathurst 2007 und 2010 zwölf Stunde Gewinner Jaffa the angry ant - mid 70's Honda 市民の, 73 と立方インチ LSD Elle "the body" shell - early 70's Datsun フェアレディ coupe. いい体は彼女の内側、内側と土台を待つ
Rev28K is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2009, 08:05 AM   #43
Fev
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Fev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cattai, Sydney
Posts: 7,701
Default

"sport version of the Veyron"

never thought i'd hear that! ahaha this car is just amazing - can't wait to see Captain Slow sh%7 himself in it!
__________________
1992 EBII Fairmont Ghia 4.0l <---Click for the Gallery!
Insta@mooneye_ghia
White on bright red smoothies with thick whitewalls. Cruising around to some rockabilly
Fev is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2009, 02:18 PM   #44
ltd_on20s
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
ltd_on20s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 618
Default

i want it.

being in adelaide with some wacko dude's driving cars i'll now await someone to tell me that their excel with twin 5 inch cannons and pod filter would roast it off the lights.....
ltd_on20s is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2009, 03:14 PM   #45
SE Ute
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 96
Default

I'm surprised you lot aren't discussing what mods you'd do to it, squeeze a bit more out of it, you know what these conservative car companies are like, sacrificing performance for reliability and comfort.
SE Ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2009, 03:24 PM   #46
XR6_190
BF XR6, oh yeah!!
 
XR6_190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melton, Vic
Posts: 1,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jondalar
Topgear claimed each original Veyron cost about twice as much to make as they sold for, wonder what the ratio would be for that beastie?
Yes Volkswagen do build these at a substantial loss, but a car like this is not built to make money, it is more like a road legal concept car that actually gets sold. Purely an engineering experiment. The fact that they are willing to upgrade it, and that they are planning a new one in a few years is the truly astonishing part.
__________________
Current ride: 2005 BF XR6 Sedan, Lightning Strike, ZF Auto
Previous ride: 2001 AUII Futura Sedan, Narooma Blue
XR6_190 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2009, 05:35 PM   #47
ImpGonads
Fart Poweredâ„¢
 
ImpGonads's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 869
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tex
Me thinks a fighter pilot is a tad closer to the 'threshold' than the fat bloke with 2 mil to drop on a mega car ever will be...?
Haha touche! But we are talking about totally different conditions. Skies vs. Road, althought the physics of G-Forces still apply you can get away with more in the air, as your aren't governed by traction. I guess I was really getting at the overall drive-ability... Only so much power you can keep down.

Love to be proved wrong
__________________
"Ye tho I walk through the valley of rice... I fear no turbo...for torque are with me."
ImpGonads is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-02-2009, 11:21 AM   #48
pauljh74
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
pauljh74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,602
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fev
"sport version of the Veyron"

never thought i'd hear that! ahaha this car is just amazing - can't wait to see Captain Slow sh%7 himself in it!
That's the scary thing - the original and "slow" version has ~1000BHP
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Webber
Not bad for a #2 driver
Mark Webber after winning the 2010 British Grand Prix.
pauljh74 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL