Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-2010, 07:53 PM   #1
csv8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
csv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Q..10kms west of Rocky...
Posts: 8,318
Exclamation Locals councils say no to mobile speed cameras

Locals councils say no to mobile speed cameras
Updated November 4, 2010 14:49:00
Local councils are rejecting the use of privatised mobile speed cameras, claiming they are a cash grab by the New South Wales Government.
The number of private operators able to catch speeding motorists is being ramped up, and parking inspectors in the Gosford City Council have been told to issue fines to mobile vans found to be parked illegally, in an effort to get rid of them.
The President of the New South Wales Local Government Association, Keith Rhodes, says he supports Gosford's decision to try to ban them.
"This is simply revenue raising for dollars to go into consolidated revenue with absolutely nothing being returned to improving the conditions of the road which we all know are the factors contributing to fatalities on our major road networks," he said.
The Premier Kristina Keneally says if mobile speed camera operators break the rules they should face penalties.
Ms Keneally says speed cameras are important tools in reducing road deaths, but operators have to abide by the rules.
"If a mobile speed camera is not being operated in accordance with the law, the council should of course issue an infringement but equally so we ask all motorists to obey the rules of the road because quite frankly the life that is lost could be yours, a family member or could be devastating for someone else's family," she said.

Lets hope other Councils follow!!!

__________________
CSGhia
csv8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-11-2010, 08:04 PM   #2
galaxy xr8
Giddy up.
 
galaxy xr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kramerica Industries.
Posts: 15,639
Default

Yeah just watched a similar story on ACA.
galaxy xr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-11-2010, 08:09 PM   #3
SSD-85
Donating Member
Donating Member1
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,142
Default

Would have to be very naive to think this will get rid of camera operators. Just another level of Government making a cash grab of its own.
SSD-85 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-11-2010, 08:20 PM   #4
Jim Goose
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
Default

The story on ACA also made reference to this website which was started in order to try and fight the use of speed cameras....

http://www.up2speedclub.com.au/

Has been formed to protect Australian Motorists rights and to force state govts into changing the antiquated, revenue biased and downright unfair system of speeding Fine detection. We are about addressing the real issues behind the carnage on our roads, giving alternatives that actually work and stopping the abuse of police power by our constabulary in the speed detection area
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions??

Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole....
Jim Goose is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-11-2010, 08:36 PM   #5
gtfpv
GT
 
gtfpv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
Default

reading this 1st post you get the feeling that the govt would feel vindicated, if road deaths increased , they would use it as evidence of more demand for more speed cameras.
gtfpv is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-11-2010, 08:37 PM   #6
flappist
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty85
Would have to be very naive to think this will get rid of camera operators. Just another level of Government making a cash grab of its own.
Yep. I suspect you are pretty close to the truth there.
flappist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-11-2010, 08:42 PM   #7
fmc351
let it burn
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: QUEENSLANDER!!!!!
Posts: 2,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty85
Would have to be very naive to think this will get rid of camera operators. Just another level of Government making a cash grab of its own.
Yep, an offer of some tidbit the council wants (oh ...lets say new air conditioners), and the 'protest' will cease.


Edit: Ninja'd
fmc351 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-11-2010, 08:51 PM   #8
Ben73
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ben73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,344
Default

I will support that website.

I saw a Mobile speed camera operator speeding in the friggin camera car. I contacted the RTA and complained about it, but I doubt they did anything about it.
Ben73 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-11-2010, 08:54 PM   #9
mik
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
mik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
Default

its good to see some one saying no to the cash grabbers, the poor old motorist is an easy target, some councils are even patrolling super markets with parking inspectors down here in mexico, its almost like racism, your a motorist ..... WE WILL COME AFTER YOU ........ !!! YOU WILL PAY !!! and pay, and pay ,and pay.
mik is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-11-2010, 08:59 PM   #10
Keepleft
Mot Adv-NSW
 
Keepleft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lake Macquarie, NSW
Posts: 2,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Goose
The story on ACA also made reference to this website which was started in order to try and fight the use of speed cameras....

http://www.up2speedclub.com.au/

Has been formed to protect Australian Motorists rights and to force state govts into changing the antiquated, revenue biased and downright unfair system of speeding Fine detection. We are about addressing the real issues behind the carnage on our roads, giving alternatives that actually work and stopping the abuse of police power by our constabulary in the speed detection area
Okay, up till this bit:-
Quote:
Roads
We intend to force governments to adopt a patented method of coloured road markings that alert drivers to dangerous road conditions. This will also include pressure on authorities when a member points out a particularly bad piece of road in their own area.
Duh, needn't point out why this is 'dumb'.
__________________
ORDER FORD AUSTRALIA PART NO: AM6U7J19G329AA. This is a European-UN/AS3790B Spec safety-warning triangle used to give advanced warning to approaching traffic of a vehicle breakdown, or crash scene (to prevent secondary). Stow in the boot area. See your Ford dealer for this $35.95 safety item & when you buy a new Ford, please insist on it! See Page 83, part 4.4.1 http://www.transport.wa.gov.au/media...eSafePart4.pdf
Keepleft is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-11-2010, 09:10 PM   #11
Streets
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: QLD
Posts: 685
Default

Streets is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 04-11-2010, 09:28 PM   #12
rancidpunx
FPV GTR
 
rancidpunx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Island High Country
Posts: 2,355
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: For technical contribution to all things car-care related. And helping/advising forum members with the best possible information. 
Default

Looks like a good website, although it looks like it just might be the fella selling a subscription for his "infringement consultancy" rather than an organised group to fight the government in numbers. Good money though at $90 a pop, especially if he expects to get 2 million members.

Although good on Gosford RE:OP
__________________
- FPV GT RSpec -
- Chill SZ Territory Titanium -
The Family Bus
- Veridian Green PJ Ranger XLT -
The Work Truck

rancidpunx is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL