|
|
15-01-2009, 08:31 AM | #1 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 7,946
|
just wondering if i have this right
i traveled 422klm and just put 40.86 liters of fuel in now i divided the klm traveled (from full tank ) to the liters put in and come up with 10.33l/100 is that the right way to do the calculation or am i going the wrong way about it thanks in advance Grimus
__________________
no longer have a ford but a ford man at heart R.I.P 98 EL MAY YOU HAVE A GOOD LIFE IN FALCON HEAVEN [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
||
15-01-2009, 08:58 AM | #2 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Adelaide SA
Posts: 1,255
|
422km/40.86ltr= the car travels 10.33km using 1 ltr of fuel
100km/10.33ltr= 9.68ltrs of fuel used per 100km of driving edit: obviously the more numbers used after decimal place included in calculation the more accurate final numbers will be. Eg; if you done 100/10.3 only outcome will be 9.7ltr/100km instead of 9.68ltr/100km pretty sure thats how its worked out Ive always based consumption of my cars based on how long it will drive per litre in other words how much it can get on a tank. The ltrs/100km is used throughout car stats etc etc each to thier own I guess Last edited by ea90gl; 15-01-2009 at 09:10 AM. |
||
15-01-2009, 12:37 PM | #3 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,296
|
Quote:
Can anyone explain how this twisted logic of liters/100km came about? As far as I am concerned it is totally illogical. Give me back the good old miles per gallon, (and the fuel price to match :voldar02: ) |
|||
15-01-2009, 08:59 AM | #4 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vic/NSW
Posts: 2,687
|
Quote:
|
|||
15-01-2009, 09:03 AM | #5 | ||
When in doubt, GAS IT!!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lower Eyre Peninsula, SA
Posts: 3,018
|
deleted
__________________
. HERS- BFIII Wagon Gold, alloys, dual fuel, bullbar, big tow pack, trans cooler, fully rebuilt HD suspension, Clarion, alarmed, full 2 1/2" sports system, mint body MINE- AUII Forte Meteorite, dual fuel but otherwise bog stock. MINE- AUII Fairlane Sportsman Liquid Silver over meteorite,HIDs', Airhog, Eagle Leads, dual fuel, custom rear springs, BA slotted discs + a second one for spares . |
||
15-01-2009, 10:18 AM | #6 | ||
VFII SS UTE
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 6,353
|
fuel / dist x 100 =
__________________
I don't often hear the sound of a screaming LSX. But when I do, So do the neighbours.. GO SOUTHS
|
||
15-01-2009, 10:30 AM | #7 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 7,946
|
thanks guys
so going on the figures i am getting 9.68 litres to the 100 which is pretty bloody good for an I6 ?? i dont think it is to bad considering the cam ect that i am running Grimus
__________________
no longer have a ford but a ford man at heart R.I.P 98 EL MAY YOU HAVE A GOOD LIFE IN FALCON HEAVEN [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
||
15-01-2009, 12:05 PM | #8 | |||
1999 Ford Fairmont Ghia
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,162
|
Quote:
My AU Ghia gets about 8L/100km highway 14L/100km around town My XE cammed with 465 Holley and 5 speed gets around 11L/100km highway and 15L/100km around town. I consider the I6 an economical motor given it's capacity, power and the weight of the vehicle. |
|||
15-01-2009, 06:21 PM | #9 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,458
|
Quote:
|
|||
16-01-2009, 09:39 AM | #10 | |||
XP Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,098
|
Quote:
|
|||
15-01-2009, 12:13 PM | #11 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Adelaide SA
Posts: 454
|
Quote:
No sir, you're getting 9.68 km for every Litre, which equates to 10.33 Litres per 100km. Even so 10.33 is pretty good for around town, if you are driving around town that is. |
|||
15-01-2009, 12:29 PM | #12 | |||
Just slidin'
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 7,791
|
Quote:
__________________
MD Mondeo - For the family
NP Pajero - For the adventure |
|||
16-01-2009, 04:44 PM | #13 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Adelaide SA
Posts: 454
|
Quote:
|
|||
16-01-2009, 06:12 PM | #14 | |||
Just slidin'
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 7,791
|
Quote:
No probs I do it all the time, lol.
__________________
MD Mondeo - For the family
NP Pajero - For the adventure |
|||
15-01-2009, 12:42 PM | #15 | ||
VFII SS UTE
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 6,353
|
it's the same thing.
just simplified.
__________________
I don't often hear the sound of a screaming LSX. But when I do, So do the neighbours.. GO SOUTHS
|
||
15-01-2009, 12:45 PM | #16 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,138
|
__________________
Who cares how it looks, power is everything. Looks are for metrosexuals..... |
||
15-01-2009, 12:53 PM | #17 | ||
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Foothills of the Macedon Ranges
Posts: 18,606
|
Yep, Montys correct.
Litres per 100km means that the higher the number, the more fuel is used, easy. Just calculate: 40.86 (litres) / 422 (km), then multiply by 100. Just doing this only once at the servo is an indication only, regardless of how many decimal places used, as the tank doesn't fill up to the exact level each time. Doing it each time you fill up gives a much better indication of fuel consumption of the car, and then you can compare it to the average thats showing on the display. |
||
15-01-2009, 01:45 PM | #18 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: GEELONG
Posts: 7,946
|
that figure was a mix of highway and around town with a few squirts here and there
__________________
no longer have a ford but a ford man at heart R.I.P 98 EL MAY YOU HAVE A GOOD LIFE IN FALCON HEAVEN [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
||
16-01-2009, 06:00 AM | #19 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Assens, Denmark
Posts: 622
|
If you want to get an accurate average reading, you will need to do this over several times you fill up at the servo. Sometimes you get more fuel in the tank than others.
In the LTD I fill up until I can see the fuel sitting at the top of the filler neck, but with later model unleaded vehicles this may not be possible. Best L/100Km I've had was on the trip up to Rocky: 17L/100Km on the highway at constant 100Km/h. Worst is around town with no highway driving, stop and start: 24L/100Km. And no, I don't have a fuel leak. I also have a Ford Festiva which generally gets me around 8L/100Km combined driving, or 7L/100Km on the highway. A/C on all the time. I work out my fuel usage every time I fill up. I think it's called OCD. PS: Yes, it's number of litres divided by Km travelled x 100. |
||
16-01-2009, 08:35 AM | #20 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 2,368
|
I do this :-
(100km / distance travelled) x amount of fuel used = __________ |
||
16-01-2009, 09:54 AM | #21 | ||
THE Fairmont Ghia 75th
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: S.E Suburbs, Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 615
|
best i have had my ghia is 9.2l per 100k's and i think the average speed was about 50km/hr or so. half around town(forever stop starting) and about 150 of those k's were highway driving. as soon as it is just driven around town for a week and no highway it jumps to around 13.5-14l per 100. I6's r so bad on the economy side.i hope to get some good k's on a trip tho, as long as i dont sit on more than 100km/hr or 2000rpm
__________________
Current Ride : AUII Fairmont Ghia : 75th Anniversary Limited Edition
Current Mods-HD Built Gearbox+(Mirror Polished, Modified Valve Body), 2500rpm Hi-Stall Convertor(TCE Custom Built), BIG Trans Cooler, Braided Lines/Speedflow Fittings, 2.5" Exhaust, Custom CAI, Detailed UnderCarriage, Custom SQ Stereo Install. My Ride My Build Thread |
||
16-01-2009, 10:20 AM | #22 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 808
|
i havnt had my EA long (was dads and he passed away recently), but on gas i did 250 kms towing my ski, and it used 45.2 litres. thats works out to 18.08 litres per 100kms or 15.62MPG. gas uses more litres of course and it only cost $20.30 for the trip.
|
||